Control by Carbon: The Totalitarian Side of Climate Change
“We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”
You will be told, if you haven’t already, that climate change is “the defining challenge of our age.” So says Ban Ki Moon, the United Nation’s Secretary General. Global warming is “really going to kill us all.” You will be told that it is our fault, that the sun has little to do with the warming.
You will also be told that global warming is “the first component of authentic global governance.” Then again, you might not, but it is the most likely.
Climate change is the key to controlling the masses now. And many are willing to submit:
Eighty-three percent of people polled in 21 countries said a change in lifestyle and behavior for their countrymen would be necessary to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, according to the poll from BBC World Service.
The results of that poll are disturbing (not to mention suspect), and it makes me wonder what kind of changes our Green overlords have in store for us.
Population Control
One definite change is the size of our families. Population control is something the enviro-mafia has sought for years. In 1968, Paul R. Ehrlich published “The Population Bomb,” which warned us all of impending doom. He preached to the masses that “in the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death.” He stated later, “I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000.”
Now it isn’t the lack of food that is going to result in millions of deaths. It’s climate change. And the massive population of the world contributes a huge amount of carbon to the atmosphere. It’s vital that we drastically reduce the amount of life on this planet if we want to live.
Some suggest a heavy tax on procreation. Well, not so much the act, but the results if successful. If you have a child, you need to pay a fee:
A WEST Australian medical expert wants families to pay a $5000-plus “baby levy” at birth and an annual carbon tax of up to $800 a child.
Writing in today’s Medical Journal of Australia, Associate Professor Barry Walters said every couple with more than two children should be taxed to pay for enough trees to offset the carbon emissions generated over each child’s lifetime…
It has yet to be suggested, but I would not be surprised to see abortions resulting in carbon credits. After all, “Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.” Or it might come to pass that newborns are just sold for meat. Lyall Watson told the The Financial Times in 1995, “Cannibalism is a “radical but realistic solution to the problem of overpopulation.” After all, if the tyranny of Green succeeds, there won’t be much steak.
The Terror of Cow Farts
Cow. It’s what’s for dinner, for now anyway. But the Green mafia is aiming for the prime rib on your plate. Your menu is killing the planet:
The study says that people in wealthy countries should more than halve their daily meat intake – particularly red meat – over the next 40 years to stop emissions rising even further, with the long-term goal of cutting average meat consumption worldwide to 90 grams a day by 2050.
“People in wealthy countries.” Read: the United States.
See, the cows eat, and then they pass gas. There’s a lot of methane introduced, just so you can order one medium-rare.
“We are going to take the Monster Burger away from you on behalf of the common good.”
But it isn’t just beef. It’s poultry, pork and lamb. Meat is methane and you can’t have that anymore. But you could switch to kangaroo. Or moose.
For now, a switch to the vegetarian lifestyle is just being suggested. And people are being encouraged to raise the awareness of the danger of your diet:
Also raising the awareness of the climate impact of our behaviour as consumers is important. Organisations like the European Vegetarian Union can play an important role. Rather than any theoretical command and control policy by governments awareness of consumers plays a significant role in changing consumption patterns of agricultural products. In this respect I would like to encourage you to continue your work.
You and I both know it is a short walk from suggesting to mandating.
How You Get Around
Just about every red-blooded American male has thought about what it would be like to drive on the Autobahn. If you are one of them, you better book a flight to Germany soon. It’s under attack from the enviro-mafia:
Many stretches of German autobahn lack speed limits — traditionally a cherished freedom in a rule-bound country. However, the growing concern over carbon dioxide emissions is putting that tradition under renewed scrutiny.
“There are so many areas in which we waste energy in a completely senseless way and burden the climate,” Dimas told the Bild am Sonntag newspaper.
Maybe they could just introduce some type of government imposed speed governor on the cars in Germany. Then they could still drive as fast as the car could go, but it just couldn’t go that fast. That would at least be better than imposing CAFE standards on cars, resulting in the death of 7,700 people for every mile per gallon saved. Then again, if we raised the CAFE standards higher, we could really lower the population.
Air travel isn’t safe either. Suggestions have been made to tax air travel in order to save us all from our need for adventure:
[Tom Jenkins] pointed out that the UK Department for Transport had calculated that existing taxes on flight tickets, the air passenger duty, brought in about £900 million (US$1,800m) which already more than offset the cost of aircraft CO2 emissions. “Only three percent of all global CO2 emissions are caused by aviation. If we stopped all flying tomorrow it would not save the planet – it would cause massive disruption,†said Jenkins.
The fact that it would do more harm than good has not stopped environmentalists from advocating it.
In Your Home
No incandescent light bulbs. Big deal, right. Not really, but the big deal is that we no longer have a choice. That is a big deal to me. The government has restricted my access to the light bulb for my own good. I’m not really comfortable with that kind of control from on high. And now California has tried to take government control a step further:
Next year in California, state regulators are likely to have the emergency power to control individual thermostats, sending temperatures up or down through a radio-controlled device that will be required in new or substantially modified houses and buildings to manage electricity shortages.
Imagine yourself enjoying the air conditioner on a hot, summer day. you just finished mowing the lawn, you are hot and sweaty and you just want to stand there by that vent and cool off. Then your air conditioner stops. And you can’t control it.
It is best summed up in this very socialist statement by Dr. Arthur Rosenfeld: “If you can control rotating outages by letting everyone in the state share the pain,†he said, “there’s a lot less pain to go around.â€
It doesn’t matter that you were not in pain before. We have to take away some comfort on behalf of the common good. In a state that wants to regulate the power generation of plants in other states, just because they dared to sell them electricity, maybe the problem isn’t global warming in California.
Even though the plan was rejected, we have to wonder: how big a deal is this lack of electricity or control of your thermostat?
Well, in 2003, 35,000 people in Europe died because of a heat wave. France lost 15,000 people. Read that again and ask yourself why?
European cities are virtually devoid of air conditioning in large part because the energy to run them is so expensive. And why is that? Pressured by vocal environmentalists, European governments have levied energy tax after energy tax, with the latest excuse being global warming.
The mathematics of this problem are terribly transparent. In order to meet their self-imposed targets from the Kyoto Protocol on global warming, European nations already have taxed energy, but they have not done enough. Consequently, even more restrictions are being proposed, especially by the German government. Unaffordable air conditioning will become even more expensive, killing more and more Europeans the next time the temperature reaches what passes for a few degrees above what is normal in Dallas.
Europe has effectively imposed a continuous blackout on air conditioning, and now it is paying the price.
Meanwhile, the Greens are talking about global warming being a killer and how it is going to get so much worse. I believe you. I think it is going to get worse. More people are going to die because of policies like this that keep air conditioning from the poorest populations, resulting in heat related deaths by the thousands.
Nice work.
What’s Left
Great Britain has taken too big a bite. Death by a thousand cuts means you don’t run up and stab someone. But, like California’s thermostat plan, they skipped the cut and went for the impalement:
Every person in Britain would be given a “carbon limit” under radical government plans to limit emissions, it was announced today.
Everybody could be issued with a “carbon credit card” which they would swipe when buying petrol, paying their utility bills, purchasing food, or travelling.
People with lifestyles that are damaging to the environment – such as frequent fliers, motorists who drive gas-guzzling vehicles or people who live in large homes with poor insulation – would have to buy more carbon credits from greener individuals.
They just tried to run a catch-all program that covered every part of a Brits life. Every aspect, covered by a card that will force you to live a greener life. Or pay.
How long before that type of idea finds a foothold in America’s governing body? It would start on the state level maybe, a few states try it out like a fresh pair of shackles. Then the federal government likes what it sees and makes it national. Rather than try to regulate this or restrict that, they cover all the bases with, ironically, a little piece of plastic. Now, you can’t buy everything you wanted like before without it costing you. Your freedom is no more. You have become a part of the collective.
Instead of “Give me liberty or give me death,” we have “We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”
Common good dressed in green, that is.
http://www.allamericanblogger.com/2014/control-by-carbon-the-totalitarian-side-of-climate-change/
AH COLLECTIVISM – SOMETHING WE ALL VOTED FOR—–NOT!
DEMOCRACY IS WHERE?
http://devilskitchen.me.uk/2007/10/totalitarian-britain.html FABIAN TEXT TENDS TO BACK PROHIBITION.
“Long term goal: Prohibition”
And Hello Eurabia?
However, does anyone find it odd that while 1 million+ youngsters gurn on ecstasy each week, we get a “crackdown” on doddering old middle class Mr and Mrs Bowes-Lloyd from some village in Surrey.
Secondly, we are now in a situation where you can take as many drugs as you like in any nightclub – put light a ciggie and the bouncers will go after you big time.
What kind of fucking message is that?
utter lunacy. Actually, I think they are all loony tunes – “Common Purpose” must have eaten their brains like the infested maggot of EUSSR communism that it is.
Looking on the bright side, if thick Nazi bitches like Primadonna prevent everyone smoking, drinking and eating what they like, the British people will soon be fit enough, lean enough, sober enough, and above all, angry enough to destroy these insolent, lying little fascist turds once and for all. They will also have more spare cash to spend on weaponry. These fools are making a rod for their own backs.
One of the main targets of Common Purpose is the police because Common Purpose is obsessed with social control. Fabian ‘New’ Labour has already turned Britain into a police state.
There is a surveillance camera system in Britain which would have been beyond the wildest dreams of the Stasi. Britain is now an endemic surveillance society.
I recommend that you read ‘The Unsettling Comparison of the Common Purpose British Police Force (State Service) with that of Communist East Germany’s Stasi’ (.pdf) here.
Fabians of the Yard
Curiously enough, there was once a police drama series on TV about Inspector Fabian of Scotland Yard. Since the politicisation of the police there are now real Fabians of the Yard – Common Purpose Fabians.
How Common Purpose seeks to corruptly influence the police
1. CommonPurposeInstructionstoPolice.pdf is a pdf file of a copy of a letter sent by Common Purpose to the Chief Constable of Fife giving instructions on how to deal with Freedom of Information requests made to him about Common Purpose. Many other Chief Constables would have received similar instructions.
Why is an ‘educational charity’ like Common Purpose giving instructions to police officers about how they should handle Freedom of Information requests made to them about Common Purpose? What is going on?
2. Norwich prison released to Common Purpose the name and address of a person who quite legitimately asked them, under the Freedom of Information Act, why the prison was providing offices for Common Purpose, and how much Common Purpose was paying. HMP Norwich had no right to release this information contrary to the Data Protection Act and has had to apologise.
Why does Common Purpose want to know the identities of those people making FOI requests about them? Why did HMP Norwich flagrantly breach the Data Protection Act? What action is being taken against them?
3. “Just why are the police and CP so frightened of the public finding out what takes place in their training under Chatham House Rules? What has happened to probity?” More about Common Purpose and the police here.
How many more examples are there of Common Purpose corruptly influencing members of the police, judiciary, prison service and armed forces?
‘ello, ‘ello, ‘ello, wot’s goin’ on ‘ere?
Police officers are supposed to operate ‘without fear or favour’ but there are plenty of favours being done by Common Purpose police for their colleagues in the Common Purpose network.
There is no need whatsoever for police officers to be part of any Common Purpose style network or act as agents for the European Union’s espionage service.
Police officers are also supposed to have allegiance to the Crown and not to Brussels.
All police officers who are Common Purpose ‘graduates’ have been corrupted and are totally untrustworthy. They are a disgrace to their uniform and should be removed from office immediately.
All police officers (and all other government employees for that matter) should be banned from attending any Common Purpose ‘training’ course.
Common Purpose should be investigated for fraud by police not corrupted by Common Purpose – if they can find any.
This is the thin end of a very nasty wedge.
Common Purpose has corrupted the police. The people of Britain have a really serious problem to solve. <!–
*Yes, the photograph is real. When I read stories like this, I really wonder whether the government seriously expects anyone to believe that “the influx of immigrants from Eastern Europe into Britain has not fuelled a rise in crime”.
Especially when “The report for the Association of Chief Police Officers appears to contradict claims made by several senior officers that forces require extra money to cope with an immigrant crimewave.”
The report from the Association of Chief Police Officers has Common Purpose influence written all over it.
Also, consider this quote from here “Titles given to some senior officers and staff at Suffolk Police, included: “Head of Protective Services”, “Head of Citizen Focus”, “Director of Criminal Justice Change” and “Director of Knowledge Architecture”.”
This Newspeak bullshit also has the mark of Common Purpose all over it. In particular, when you hear the word “change” alarm bells should start to ring.
DOWNLOAD 37kB .pdf file:
How Common Purpose has corrupted the British police –>
|
This article explores affinities between postindustrialism and modes of thinking characteristic of the Fabian Society, especially in the first half of the twentieth century. In the hands of Daniel Bell and others, the information society thesis postulates the coming of a postindustrial society marked by the centrality of information and knowledge. While caveats abound in Bell’s version, the thesis has been generally optimistic in outlook, portraying postindustrial society as an advanced level of social development. Interestingly, the Fabian Society, a British-based organization highly influential in the twentieth-century project of social democracy, also emphasized information in its advocacy of social progress: ‘laying a foundation of fact’, according to one commentator, was a key ingredient of the Fabian approach. Texts by thinkers such as Sidney Webb and H.G. Wells suggest that ‘informationalism’, a commitment to information in an original sense of hard facts and figures, must indeed be construed as the essence of Fabianism, as that which distinguishes the Fabians from more metaphysical or emotional expressions of socialism. The article traces the link between information-powered politics and the largely successful practice of social engineering in Britain. However, social engineering can, and in the case of some Fabians did, degenerate into a technocratic and even totalitarian mindset. Critiques of Fabianism are therefore also acknowledged here, including those claiming that the Fabian preoccupation with data-gathering and filing, its ‘proceduralism’, actually constituted a major weakness. However, given its noble informational ideal, Fabianism can, the article concludes, illuminate contemporary information society problems. The Fabian tradition contains suggestive materials on such topical themes as fair access to information, the role of facts in progressive politics, and the prospects for an international institutional order.
|
| Keywords: Postindustrialism; Fabian Society; social democracy; internationalism; information policy |
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a755296192
DATA GATHERING AND FILING—-THATS’ THE UK GOVERNMENT OK!
The Fabians plan to rule American neighborhoods based on the Soviet and Chinese models for totalitarian communities. In their skewed world view it is acceptable and okay to lie and sneak new fascist systems into formerly free countries, because ultimately it will create a lovely Utopian paradise on Mother Earth.
Their key phrases are “global security,” “human rights,” “hummanitarian,” “social justice,” and “peace.” You will never hear a Fabian defend legitimate national law based in the U.S. Bill of Rights. They call individual liberty and freedom “old-fashioned” and “outdated.” Fabian propagandists distort reality. Their goal is to confuse and manipulate free people into giving up their freedom for world peace and security. Fabians say the American principles for freedom must be balanced in order to “save the planet” and “stop global terrorism.” (They never admit they’re the terrorists.)
Fabianism is elite training in socialist propaganda. Fabian followers are called “agents for change.” Fabian facilitators are installed in every government agency in the world, and they influence all mainstream media outlets. They are the reason Americans never hear about communitarianism or Local Agenda 21.
AGENTS FOR CHANGE—-WHETHER YOU WANT COMMUNISM OR NOT!!!
British Revisionism and the Fabian Society
by Niki Raapana, revised October 14, 2005
Turks haven’t learned the British way of denying atrocities By George Monbiot, December 28, 2005 at DAWN.com.
Fabian socialism, like political communitarianism, is virtually unknown to most Americans. Our purpose at this website is to educate free citizens about the emerging global synthesis. Socialism is part II b. of the Hegelian dialectical triad. The ACL studies Fabian socialism not only because it is a root part of the core mathematical equation designed to move the world into submitting to a lovlier version of a centralized global government, but also because 1.) The founder of American Communitarianism is a Fabian, 2.) The Fabians established the very influential London School of (Marxist) Economics, 3.) The Fabians train the “facilitators” who lead Americans to consensus in UN-LA-21 meetings.
British Revisionism and the Fabian Society
by Niki Raapana, revised October 14, 2005
Turks haven’t learned the British way of denying atrocities By George Monbiot, December 28, 2005 at DAWN.com.
Fabian socialism, like political communitarianism, is virtually unknown to most Americans. Our purpose at this website is to educate free citizens about the emerging global synthesis. Socialism is part II b. of the Hegelian dialectical triad. The ACL studies Fabian socialism not only because it is a root part of the core mathematical equation designed to move the world into submitting to a lovlier version of a centralized global government, but also because 1.) The founder of American Communitarianism is a Fabian, 2.) The Fabians established the very influential London School of (Marxist) Economics, 3.) The Fabians train the “facilitators” who lead Americans to consensus in UN-LA-21 meetings.
TOTALITARIANISM—-NEXT TIME COMRADE PRUDENCE BROWNSKI SAYS DEMOCRACY-OR OUR COUNTRY—–THINK LIAR!!!
“abortions resulting in carbon credits.”
That’s a good one, I had never thought of that. I would not be surprised to see carbon credits in exchange for dead babies. I would not put it past these people.
And this December at the Copenhagen conference, population control will be front and centre. And most of the focus will be directed at women, as if men have nothing to do with it! lol!!
When they can rip a baby from it’s mother’s womb at six month’s old, there isn’t anything these Fascist’s won’t do!!
After all their eugenics policies are what excited Hitler, policies they still carry out today, just using a changed name.
I imagine the population control has already begun, vaccine’s for this, that and the other, as if!
Thalidomide, wasn’t too long ago, and while it wasn’t a vaccine, it was made by large Pharma industries, claiming it to be safe to give to pregnant women.
Devide and conquer, feminist of the Marxist variety aiding their Marxist brotherhood. trying to convince female’s that all men are rapist’s and they’d be better off without any.