26 Aug 2009
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon - UN News Centre 11 Aug 2009: We have a choice: adapt or perish.
“Climate change is the fundamental threat to humankind.
It exacerbates all of the problems we face: poverty, disease, hunger and insecurity. It impedes progress toward the Millennium Development Goals. It deepens the food and energy crises.
If we fail to act, climate change will intensify droughts, floods and other natural disasters. Water shortages will affect hundreds of millions of people. Malnutrition will engulf large parts of the developing world. Tensions will worsen. Social unrest – even violence – could follow. The damage to national economies will be enormous. The human suffering will be incalculable.
As we move toward Copenhagen in December, we must “Seal a Deal” on climate change that secures our common future. We have just four months to secure the future of our planet.Two years ago, only a handful of world leaders could talk about climate change. Today, leaders of all the world, all the countries on every continent are aware of the threats we face now.
When the leaders of the G-8 agreed in July to keep the global temperature increase within two degrees centigrade by the year 2050, that was welcomed and I welcome that statement. It was not enough. But leaders have agreed to cut green house gas emissions by 80 per cent by 2050.
Developed countries must provide sufficient, measurable, reportable and verifiable financial and technological support to developing countries. Developing countries, especially the most vulnerable, will collectively need billions of dollars in public financing for adaptation.
I am talking here about new money. This is one of the most important issues which we are going to discuss on September 22nd in New York, and this year again at the G20 Summit Meeting in Pittsburgh on September 24th. We need an equitable and accountable mechanism for distributing these financial and technological resources. I promise you my best effort to push, pull and cajole national leaders into acting in our common global interest.”
The Telegraph 13 Aug. 2009: Australia’s Senate - the Government’s upper house - has just voted by 42 to 30 to defeat the cap and trade legislation bill proposed by their premier Kevin Rudd. The majority did so – duh – because they didn’t want their coal-dependent heavy industry hamstrung by still more pointless taxation and regulation, their consumers fleeced and their economy ruined in the middle of a thwacking great global recession. And, in at least the case of Senator Steve Fielding, because they’d done their research and discovered that Anthropogenic Global Warming is a figment of Al Gore’s imagination.
While it’s true that Nancy Pelosi managed to railroad the Waxman Markey cap’n’porkbarrel’n’trade bill through the US House of Representatives, it looks set to have a much tougher ride in the Senate. Especially given the growing strength of feeling among US voters that cap ´n trade is no more than a massive scam which will enrich one or two green vested interests – Al Gore’s, for example – while impoverishing ordinary Americans to no useful purpose whatsoever.
Here, is what the latest Gallup polls say: “The number of Americans who say the media have exaggerated global warming jumped to a record 41 percent in 2009, up from 35 percent a year ago
“What’s more, fewer Americans believe the effects of global warming have started to occur: 53 percent see signs of a hotter planet, down from 61 percent in 2008.
Not so peculiar!
Wall Street Journal 13 Aug. 2009 and Aftermath News Cold winter in Argentina
Demand for electricity surged last month as colder weather led Argentines to turn up their electric heaters during one of the winter’s coldest months. Demand for electricity rose 4.2% in July compared with the same month a year earlier, The average temperature was 10.8 degrees Celsius, or 3.5 degrees cooler than a year ago. The average temperature was also down from June, when it was 11 degrees.
The New World Order politicians have given us a global religion, Climatism, in stead of Christianity
Today´s global temperature is as it was in 1979 according to the University of Alabama´s satellite measurements – apparently much cooler than in several earlier epochs in the history of mankind (as for methods, see here).
Nevertheless politicians are claiming a global , man-made warming due to increasing CO2 as well as a lot of associated phenomena like rising sea level – although refused by NASA itself! How come?
Prof. David Zaruk, EurActiv 29 July, 2009: “We are talking about a new religion, the eco-religion. We’ve killed our Christian religion, but man can’t live without one. So rather than God we have Gaia and a certain sense of purpose in our lives to save the world. Ecological rituals to recycle and to try to lessen our ecological footprint are all very strong religious symbols which add meaning to our lives. We have an Armageddon principle of climate change, and of course good and evil depends on whether we live our lives sustainably or not. So it is a religion.
I don’t mean to be cynical about this, as religion can be quite good. But religion also tends to fight science. And a lot of environmentalists look at science as a threat, as did the Catholic Church. There are interesting parallels between these, then.
Secondly, precaution was created as a tool for policy, particularly by those who think science has gone too far, and if we are not sure where the research is going, perhaps we should opt for precaution.
There are different definitions of precautionary principle, and here we see where science and policy break down. The first definition was formulated in the Rio Earth Summit (1992) Declaration, at a time when scientists started to talk about climate change and when the idea of sustainable development was introduced. It is referred to as the triple negative: ‘If you don’t have enough information on something, it does not give you a reason to not do something’. At Rio, there was not enough evidence to prove that the world was warming (or that it was due to human activities), but this was not enough of a reason not to take action to cut emissions. This definition of precaution supported science as a policy tool.
Another definition was set out by the European Commission in their 2000 Communication, which basically said: “If you don’t have enough information on something, you should withhold judgement until you get more.”
The third definition was formulated by the European Environment Agency and forcefully espoused by its science policy head, David Gee, previously an environmental activist and director of Friends of the Earth UK: “Until you have enough information to be certain about something, you should take precautions“. This definition is the most widely used in Europe now. This definition switched the burden of proof – science now has to prove that something is safe with certainty before we permit further research.”
But this religion will cost insane sums – the Luciferians´ tax -and cannot be brought off in a democratic manner. In the Short term the Waxman-Markey legislation – if passed in the US – could cost 2.4 mio US jobs over the next 2 decades.
EurActiv 24 Aug. 2009 The wildfires in Greece are now by Greenpeace being blamed on the Greek government disregarding climate change – and are said to contribute even more to global warming! Mostly, these wildfires are the works of arsonists!
The speech of the secretary general has two propagandistic elements: 1. Communist redistribution of the capital of the world – climate being the pretext. This reminds of Club of Rome´s Secretary General´s, Martin Lees´, speech to UNESCO on 15 June. 2. A blatant lie about the end of the world due to a climate change that does not even exist – also similar to what Mr. Martin Lees said. Which, of course, suggests a collusion between this New World Order clique.
But what worries me most is, however, Mr. Ban Ki-moon´s remark that whereas a couple of years ago just a handful of the world´s leaders would talk about the climate lie they have now all swallowed the bait. This will ruin the world economically – and indicates incredible power with the New World Order illuminists.
While the alarmists keep crying out about ice-free waters around the North Pole NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen even talking about it as a strategic fact, facts are quite different. Infowars 20 Aug. 2009 :“Greenpeace leader Gerd Leipold has been forced to admit that his organization issued misleading and exaggerated information when it claimed that Arctic ice would disappear completely by 2030, in a crushing blow for the man-made global warming movement.” And as New World Order propagandist claims for rapid melting of Greenlands ice: CO2 Science refers to a peer-reviewed study telling “Total annual precipitation in Greenland´s ice sheet for 1958-2007 to be up to 24% and surface mass balance to be up to 63% higher than previously thought.”
North Pole ice 22. Aug 1990 (left) and 22. Aug. 2009 (right). They had promised us we could sail around it this summer! Maybe this animated view by the University of Illinois of the Northpole ice on every 28 Oct. from 1979 to 2008 best shows the Nort Pole ice: There is absolutely no change!
After the New World Order maniacs have successfully dismantled Christianity in the Western world they are trying to substitute it for climatism and health cult as well as Islam. For they know that man is by nature religious. So let him be the saviour in stead of Christ! Let him save the planet – or at least himself! That will pacify him – and make the corporations happy. For both climate and health cost a lot of money which people gladly spend for such noble purposes. Moreover the Westener now even can help his imagined neighbours, the immigrating Muslims, to our own ruin. For are our neighbours not our fellow countrymen and our children, whom we abandon to perish in the unalterable Islamic immigration wave? The Luciferians have a tendency to turn concepts upside down.
I almost admire the UN secretary general for his shamelessness and dexterity in lying. As I have so often argued on this blog: There is no global warming, there is no climate crisis. There is a diabolical, moral crisis of corruption in the service of the New World Order corporative clique´s world governance