FABIAN SOCIALISTS GONE WILD
PART 1 of 2
By Joe Kress
March 31, 2009
NewsWithViews.com
The Fabian Society (founded January 4, 1884), began as a socialist movement in Great Britain. Its purpose is to accomplish a social democracy to transform societies and governments not through revolution but gradually. It is the foundation of the British Labor Party and subsequently it forced the decolonized of the British Empire. The Fabians favored gradual incremental change. The name was taken from the Roman Republic General Fabius Maximus or Quintus Fabius Maximus the “Cunctator.” The meaning of which is “The Delayer.” His, as indeed is the Fabian winning strategy … harassment and war of attrition rather than head on battles against his enemy, Carthage, whose defender was Hannibal Barca.
The Fabians favored nationalism of land, believing that rents collected by landowners were unearned. The founders of the Fabian Society were Sidney and Beatrice Webb (founders of the London School of Economics). Together, they wrote studies on co-operative economics applied to ownership of capital as well as land. The meat of their message was a minimum wage, creation of socialized medicine, and the abolition of hereditary peers. They favored a British Empire imperialist foreign policy as a conduit for Liberal Internationalism and reform and a welfare state modeled on the Otto von Bismarck Social Legislation and a national education system where its classrooms are the future battlefields of the Empire in which commercial prosperity are to be fought.
Famous Fabians: H.G. Wells, George Bernard Shaw Leonard and Virginia Woolf, Ramsay MacDonald, Jawaharial Nehru, writers Harold Laski and H. Tawney, G.D.H. Cole, Bertrand Russell who resigned because he believed the Socialists (Fabians) in the leadership government role against Germany would lead to war. These are just a few names of the past. The more recent rolls are composed of 5,810 individual registered members (2004).
It is more than apparent that the model of United States public education was taken out of the Fabian textbooks and from the designer of U.S. public education, Fabian Socialist John Dewey’s MATRIX for public education. It’s the same as the British counterpart, the Bismarck model, where children are really property of the state and trained to serve the state, but never to be provided an education meant for men of letters, their betters. The result of this socialist mantra is educational failure, dooming down students to the levels of uselessness within a modern society. The Bush Administration, knowingly or not knowing, greatly assisted the Fabians through the underfunded “No Child Left Behind” directive centered on the concept of minimalism based on tests set to meet universal standards and nothing more. Numerous tests are administered to determine improvement of the child, but in reality the children are taught to pass the tests and not necessarily understand the concepts behind the questions.
The dropout rate of high school students averages 50%. The United States has become the dumping ground for illegal alien families who speak only a foreign language, are mainly hard working peasants who fill jobs as laborers and displace legal Americans because they work for less, ask no questions, have no benefits and are afraid to report abuse by their employers. A large number of these children attend the public schools destined to be failures within the system. Blacks also are reflected in great numbers because of environmental, cultural and financial reasons. Past history of segregation centered them in closely tied poorer neighborhoods that had high crime rates and as a consequence resulted in pathetic, neighborhood schools. The MS-13 gang, the Crips and the Bloods are spreading nationwide. They recruit the dropouts, thus a whole new army of criminals are being nurtured on welfare, theft, murder and as distributors of illegal drugs. Our prison population has tripled without space to house them.
A famous quote is: “Fabianism feeds on Capitalism, but excretes Communism.”
Based on what has transpired since Barrack Hussein Obama’s taking the oath of office (which he flubbed on his initial try and had to have the oath of office administered a second time), the Fabian philosophy is daily being exhibited by his advocacy for progressive legislation based on equality, yet favoring those in the lower working classes vs. those of highly productive manufactures of goods and services, the investors and risk takers who create businesses and employment. In other words, the engine that made the United States the envy of the world, until globalism entered the economy and nationhood became a four letter word. Soon, the socialists and neo-Con’s greed took over the government and Wall Street. His victory in congress to pass the stimulus law makes our children’s children’s children financial slaves to the tax man. In the most perverse way, President Obama also added a litany of presidential directives to embellish abortion rights, homosexual unions and benefits; harsh hate speech laws and penalties, so-called fairness in broadcasting that destroys conservative outlets by means of implementing equal time for the liberal viewpoint. He is known by his voting record for denying private ownership of guns. New gun legislation is being prepared as this article is being written that will make it near impossible to own a gun with severe penalties for those who do.
His cabinet appointments are in the who’s who of the far left of left liberals, tax dodgers, following the example the Chairman of the House Banking Committee.
But even more alarming is the number of Democrats who in lockstep approve of Barack’s nonsensical, contradictive snake oil sales pitch. This is ample proof that the pot-smoking radicals of the sixties generation are now in charge of the United States. How can this be, one may ask? The answer lies in the public education system, the textbook publishers and the major media controllers who follow not just the Fabian ideology, but use it for an even more sinister purpose. There is more than a very strong theory that the international corporations, the central bankers are/were linked to the Soviets and international communism and Hitler’s National Socialist Party. Prescott Bush, grandfather of George H.W. Bush and great grandfather of George W. Bush along with Averill Harriman’s bank connections worked both side of the ideological fence before and during WW II.
Their banks financed Hitler and the Soviets. Averill Harriman, the financier and international banker, in WWII became the single most effective friend of the Soviets as Ambassador to the Soviet Union. Averill set up the first cement company for Stalin in the 30s. Throughout WWII the United States was infiltrated by communist spies, sympathizers and traitors located in the most sensitive areas of intelligence, in the military, in all areas of entertainment, in major media, radio, print publications, in the nation’s atomic science projects and at the highest political, diplomatic and cabinet levels.
There were congressional investigations and a list of communist sympathizers, some went to prison and others were just expelled from the Actors Guild. Senator Joseph McCarthy’s accusations brought out in the Army vs. McCarthy hearings pounded away on claims of massive infestation by Soviet agents, but McCarthy was blocked at every attempt to obtain their FBI listing. Joseph Welch finally made the statement “Senator, have you no shame? McCarthy made the statement that Welch had a Communist on his staff. President Eisenhower (CFR) squashed the entire show that had the attention of the world. As quickly as it was brought out in the open, just as quickly it died ignominiously. Later, it was found that Senator McCarthy’s suspects were actually a “Third Column” of Communists working with the Soviet Union. It was too late for McCarthy to be vindicated; he died long before the truth was revealed. The Fabian Socialists and the Communists still retained in the federal government key positions were instrumental in saving their fellow travelers, their comrades.
The influence of the central bankers and their investments in axis powers throughout the war had a lot to do with saving the Farben Corporation and plans to finance reconstruction of Europe. I.G. Farbeninindustrie AG is an outgrowth of the Nazi’s major industry for weapon development, sophisticated munitions; Sarin poison gas; a substitute for rubber with a butyl styrene substitute; and a substitute gasoline using coal for public transportation. Farben used slave labor in its weapons factories and chemical plants. None of Farben’s holdings were bombed throughout WWII for a reason. The Soviets planned to seize Farben after the war. There is no doubt that the central bank connections during and after the war were vital in protecting the central banker’s interests in financing the rebirth of Europe as well as funding the Soviet’s massive requirements. Insuring Farben’s survival, its facilities and its expertise was an added bonus to be used by our government in its plans to use the German scientific knowhow of Farben executives, engineers and scientists … human critical assets for United States defense, even hiring those who were tried at Nuremburg for war crimes.
What all this brings out is a cozy relationship with the socialists/communists and the financial institutions, the central bankers, those who control the world’s currencies. To them it matters not that political factions war between themselves … not when the key players are actually working for the global interests of the power elite mentioned below on this page. Please take the time to watch The Money Masters.
What took place at the Bretton Woods Conference is most revealing.
The United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference, commonly known as Bretton Woods conference, was a gathering of 730 delegates from all 44 Allied nations at the Mount Washington Hotel, situated in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire to regulate the international monetary and financial order after the conclusion of World War II. [1]
The conference was held from 1 July to 22 July 1944, when the agreements were signed to set up the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IBRD resulted in high interest loans to the poorest countries on projects that those countries neither needed nor wanted instead of pure water and means to improve soil and crop development…not enormous dams and wide highways where few cars travel.
As a result of the conference, the Bretton Woods system of exchange rate management was set up, which remained in place until the early 1970s. One might say that it was a bankers conference which ultimately ended up in the formulation of NAFTA, the WTO coupled with the oxymoron “free trade” that never met the meaning of the phrase. It did, however, create nations without borders, the EU and what may soon be the New American Union between Canada, Mexico and the United States which in-turn could result in a new devalued currency and great loss of the dollar’s purchasing power and a living Constitution that Supreme Court Justices Ginsburg (CFR), Breyer (CFR) support. A living Constitution is actually no Constitution and would replicate the UN’s Charter to be changed depending on which way the wind blows.
Marx believed that without socialism capitalism could not exist. One feeds on the other. Fabian socialists are the link to communism and strange as it may seem it’s the international bankers, the elite puppeteers represented within the Bilderberg Group, the enormously wealthy Windsors, George Soros, David Rockefeller, the Rothschild/Warburg/ Schiff interests, the old royal money interests, Queens of Sweden and Denmark and those key, entrenched members of parliaments, congresses, former presidents and agents for current office holding presidents and country leaders – all oligarchs.
The Royal Institute of International Affairs is a major part of the conspiracy whose rear echelons – are its Councils on Foreign Relations who infiltrate and guide the leadership or are part of the leadership in Canada, Australia, and the United States and Great Britain. These interests foresaw the need to cut the U.S. juggernaut down to a controllable size and if it took chaos as a result of Fabian Socialists and their attack on all things sacred: religion, the Constitution, the education system, an invasion of illegal aliens, subverting congress and national mores and the morals of society – if that is what it takes, they say go for it. It is part of their long term plan to institutionalize global government by and for the benefit of the elite class. It was critical that the U.S. must fall and then all other affiliated nations would likewise fall. This is now happening. The ultimate purpose of these evil maniacs is power to control and to make humanity slaves to their New World Order.
As I stated previously in my NewsWithViews articles there is a strong link between Masonic philosophy, its logo of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity stems directly from the French Revolution where Voltaire is given a halo as the ideal Freemason. The link of Freemasonry to ideals of the Revolution centers on mainly socialistic principles of equality and liberty, but any freshman political science major will tell us that pure democracy doesn’t work and total liberty ends in chaos. The Masonic ideal to solve injustice is world government. What evolved in France as a result of its revolution is a socialist republic, a hodgepodge of bureaucratic governance that stifles progress and creates factional infighting.
The question is there a link between Masonry and Fabian Socialism in the United States with so much power, wealth and sufficient control the cause of massive injections of political cash? We are told that ordinary people contributed the bulk of the funds for Obama’s election, but the amounts do not add up, because the records are not available, especially from contributions outside the United States and from wealthy interest within-country. There is ample evidence that certain organizations contributed the largest bulk of the contributions. The activist group Acorn used illegal voter solicitation methods and received from the Obama campaign managers a list of donors to solicit for fund raising. The illegal practices of the organization were squashed by Obama’s Attorney General and the media.
Within Freemasonry’s Scottish rite is the B’nai B’rith international lodge, solely a Jewish lodge different from all other lodges that admit all who are sponsored. The B’nai B’rith Lodge is the most influential and powerful of all the Scottish Rite Lodges, even the Grand Orient Lodge located in Paris. It is possible that the catbird seat of power is centered in Tel Aviv, Israel.
There is no doubt the power of Israel in American politics is disproportionate to the number of Jews who are Zionists in congress relative to the number of Jews residing in our country. The evidence of their power is so great in controlling major media outlets and the investment banking interests that Obama would support the mantra of many influential elements that the Zionists and globalist liberals support. The hate speech legislation; the outlaw of religion in government; support of the ACLU that uses the U.S. Constitution as a weapon against the founding fathers intent; AIPAC, the most influential entity for support of Israeli causes and its use of political arm-twisting; anti-Second Amendment weapon legislation; euthanasia for the elderly to include diminished support for those over 75 in proposed universal health care legislation; same sex marriage and encouragement of “playboy” hedonistic practices; preference of stem cell research on live embryos; support of Israel’s Middle East Policy; support of legislation to force Catholic Hospitals to either allow abortions or be fined into oblivion; and support of open borders and a free ride for 30 million illegal aliens are at the top of the pecking order for these liberal/communist/globalist interests.
Given the fact that Obama is striving for the same objectives would it be fair to conclude that enormous contributions from Zionists/Masonic/financial interests contributed to Barrack’s campaign? Who then really pulls Obama’s strings since obviously he had only world order social changes in mind, a plan designed by David Rockefeller to bring down the United States. Without a teleprompter he is just an empty suit. It’s not the Democrats in congress, the Fabian Socialists, the Zionists, but those in the Bilderberg, its elite banking institutions and the enormously wealthy power brokers like Maurice Strong, Mikhail Gorbachev and David Rockefeller – the puppeteers.
The elite are brilliant as was the Biblical Angel of Light who rebelled against God. They planed this world economic fall-apart. What happens when vultures hold all the key cards in a deck and collect on a meltdown in the stock market that they created through years of planning?
They collect on selling the stock market short; electronically transfer their ill-gotten loot from the depleted investments of panicked pensioners and holders of 401Ks. They then convert the profits into gold; buy rock bottom tangible investments, sit back and wait for total economic collapse leaving them in complete charge of everything worth anything. Georg Wilhelm Freidrich Hegel’s philosophy was followed to the letter where he states that out of chaos arrives a synthesis between opposing forces. In other words, create chaos, weaken the opposing force to a point that they well beg to be absorbed into their New World Order. For part two click below.
Click here for part —–> 2,
Footnotes:
1, Fabian Society information found in the Wikipedia Encyclopedia
2, This information is attributed to David N. Osteen, PhD. Executive director of the National Right to Life Committee
3, Permission granted to use information listing Bilderberg members published by the American Free Press Article “Change – Obama Inner Circle Filled With Bilderbergers “ December 22, 2008, issue 51, author, Victor Thorn. He is a hard hitting Journalist of many books on 9-11 and the World Order. Call 1-888-699-NEWS to get a complete list of Thorn’s books.
© 2008 Joe Kress – All Rights Reserved
http://www.newswithviews.com/Kress/joe137.htm
FABIAN SOCIALISTS GONE WILD
PART 2 of 2
By Joe Kress
March 31, 2009
NewsWithViews.com
Obama : The Main Man:
Dr. Sam Vaknin, author of the book “Malignant Self Love” and other extensive studies on the subject of narcissism states that “I must confess I was impressed. He looked youthful, spoke well, appeared to be confident – a wholesome package. I was soon put off, just because of his shallowness, but also there was an air of haughtiness in his demeanor that was unsettling. His posture and body language were louder than his empty words. Obama’s speech is unlike any political speech we have heard in American history. Never a politician in this land had such quasi “religious” impact on so many people. The fact Obama is incognito with zero accomplishments, makes this inexplicable infatuation alarming. Obama is not an ordinary man. He is not a genius. In fact, he is quite ignorant on most important subjects.” Narcissism or narcissist personality disorder (NPD) projects a grandiose, but false image. Dr. Vaknin states Obama is afflicted with this disorder.
Hitler and others mentally deranged in recent history were able to influence people because of their flamboyant ability to use phrases that sound eloquent with an actor’s delivery; they also had NPD.
OBAMA’S PICKS to RUN THE GOVERNMENT: Former Dallas mayor Ron Kirk to the position of U.S. Trade Representative turns out to be one more tax cheat. He failed to report $10,000 in owed income taxes during the past three years for speeches and excessive deductions for improper treatment of accounting fees on his sports games. Besides that, the Daily News states that he pocketed thousands of dollars in campaign cash from city developers whose projects he approved or funded with taxpayers money. The committee said he deducted too much for purchase of season tickets to Dallas Maverick’s professional basketball games. Kirk’s “mistakes” parallel other high profile appointees that were either threatened or derailed because of tax errors. Former senator Thomas Daschle (Health and Human Services nominee (D-S.D.) failed to pay taxes on wages for his use of a chauffeur.
Obama’s choice to be the chief performance officer, Nancy Killefer, withdrew because of failure to pay employment taxes. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner was confirmed even though he acknowledged he paid $40,000 in back employment taxes only just after being chosen for the position. The Governor of New Mexico, Bill Richardson withdrew from his appointment as Commerce Secretary after a Federal Grand Jury began investigations how a California Company contributed to Richardson’s political activities won a New Mexico Transportation contract worth more than $1 million.
The Cabinet Appointments:
Department of Health and Human Services: Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebellius represents a continuation of the extreme abortion agenda Obama hopes to enact. She is one in a line of abortion activists appointed to positions in the Obama administration: Dawn Johnsen, former legal director of NARAL, was named as assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Council; Ellen Moran, former executive director of the pro-abortion EMILY’s List, was appointed White House Communications director, and Melody Barnes, Obama’s domestic policy advisor, previously served on the boards of both EMILY’S LIST and the Planned Parent Action Fund. These are the who’s who of the Abortion Industry focused on promoting and protecting abortion on demand.[2] President Obama has rescinded the Mexico City Policy, allowing taxpayers funds to go to organizations that perform and promote abortion oversees. The Administration is set to take action to rescind a regulation that enforces federal laws protecting the conscience rights of doctors and other health care providers. The result of this would penalize doctors by removing their licenses, preventing them to practice medicine, if they refuse to commit abortions. This would result in closing Catholic hospitals’ who would never permit abortions and whose surgical doctors’ consciences would never permit committing such an abomination.
CUSTOMS AND BORDER CHIEF OF STAFF: Marco Antonio Lopez, the newly appointed chief of staff of U.S. Customs and Border Protection is a duel citizen (Mexico and the U.S.) The 32 year old former Mayor of Nogales, Arizona was selected to that position by Janet Napolitano who is Homeland Security Secretary. Napolitano, as the former Governor of Arizona blocked every attempt to stem the illegal alien invasion into the state. Her choice to head border protection is a slap in the face of the border patrol agents who really want to stop the traffic flow of illegal aliens.
Obama’s Bilderberger Selections[3]:
1. Timothy Geithner – Treasury Secretary. Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, president and CEO of Federal Reserve Bank of New York, director of policy development for IMF, member Group of Thirty (G30) employed by Kissinger & Associates. Architect of the recent 2008 financial bailouts, mentored by Lawrence Summers and Robert Rubin.
. Paul Volcker – Economic Recovery Advisory Board. Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, North American Chairman of Trilateral Commission, Federal Reserve Chairman during Carter and Reagan administrations, president of the Reserve Bank of New York, G30 member, chairman Rothschild Wolfensohn Company, key figure in the collapse of the gold standard during the Nixon administration, longtime associate of the Rockefeller family.
3. Rahm Emanuel – Chief of Staff. Member of the Israeli Defense Force, staunch Zionist, former member of the House of Representatives (D-Ill); Board of Directors for Freddie Mac; member of Bill Clinton’s finance campaign committee; made $16.2 million during 2.5 years as an investment banker. His father was a member of the Israeli Irgun terrorist group.
4. Lawrence Summers – National Economic Council. Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, treasury secretary during the Clinton administration, chief economist at the World Bank, former president of Harvard University, Brookings Institute board member, huge proponent of globalization while working for the IMF, protégé of David Rockefeller, mentored Robert Rubin.
5. David Axelrod – Senior Advisor, political consultant whose past clients include Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Christopher Dodd, main Obama fixer in the William Ayers and Reverend Wright scandal.
6. Hillary Clinton – Secretary of State. Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, clandestine CIA asset used to infiltrate the anti-war movement at Yale University and the Watergate hearings, senior partner at the Rose Law Firm, key figure in the Mena drug trafficking affair, architect of the Waco disaster, implicated in the murder/cover-up of Vince Foster, and many other deaths.
7. Joseph Biden – Vice President. Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations. U.S. Senator, since 1972, member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, current chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, strong Zionist sympathizer who recently told Rabbi Mark S, Golub of Shalom TV, “I am a Zionist. You don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist.”
8. Bill Richardson – Commerce Secretary ex-appointee. Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, former U.S. congressman, chairman of the Democratic National Convention in 2004, employee of Kissinger Associates, UN ambassador, present governor of New Mexico, former energy secretary, major player in the Monica Lewinsky cover-up with Bilderberg luminary Vernon Jordan.
9. Robert Gates – Defense Secretary. Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, former CIA Director, defense secretary under President Bush, co-chaired CFR task force with Zbigniew Brzezinski knee-deep in the Iran-Contra scandal, named in a 1999 class action lawsuit pertaining to the Mena drug trafficking affair.
10. Tom Daschle – Former Obama Health Secretary, Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, former senate majority leader, Citibank lackey, mentioned by Robert Rubin.
11. Eric Holder – Attorney General, Key person in the pardon of racketeer Marc Rich, deputy attorney general under Janet Reno, facilitated the pardon of 16 Puerto Rican terrorists under Bill Clinton.
12. Janet Napolitano – Homeland Security Director, Council on Foreign Relations, Arizona governor, attorney for Anita Hill during the Clarence Thomas hearings, U.S. attorney during the Clinton administration, instrumental in the Oklahoma City (OKC) bomb cover-up, where she declared “We’ll pursue every bit of evidence and every lead,” described as another Janet Reno, soft on illegal immigration (i.e. pro- amnesty and driver licenses to illegal aliens).* [She also is pro abortion rights and same sex marriage. [author]
13. Gen. James L. Jones – National Security Advisor, Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, European supreme allied commander, special envoy for Middle-East Security during Bush administration, board of directors for Chevron and Boeing, NATO commander, member of Brent Scowcroft’s Institute for International Affairs along with Zbigniew Brzeziniski, Bobby Ray Inman, Bilderberg luminary Henry Kissinger and former CIA Director John Deutsch (CFR).
FABIAN SOCIALISTS GONE WILD
PART 2 of 2
By Joe Kress
March 31, 2009
NewsWithViews.com
Obama : The Main Man:
Dr. Sam Vaknin, author of the book “Malignant Self Love” and other extensive studies on the subject of narcissism states that “I must confess I was impressed. He looked youthful, spoke well, appeared to be confident – a wholesome package. I was soon put off, just because of his shallowness, but also there was an air of haughtiness in his demeanor that was unsettling. His posture and body language were louder than his empty words. Obama’s speech is unlike any political speech we have heard in American history. Never a politician in this land had such quasi “religious” impact on so many people. The fact Obama is incognito with zero accomplishments, makes this inexplicable infatuation alarming. Obama is not an ordinary man. He is not a genius. In fact, he is quite ignorant on most important subjects.” Narcissism or narcissist personality disorder (NPD) projects a grandiose, but false image. Dr. Vaknin states Obama is afflicted with this disorder.
Hitler and others mentally deranged in recent history were able to influence people because of their flamboyant ability to use phrases that sound eloquent with an actor’s delivery; they also had NPD.
OBAMA’S PICKS to RUN THE GOVERNMENT: Former Dallas mayor Ron Kirk to the position of U.S. Trade Representative turns out to be one more tax cheat. He failed to report $10,000 in owed income taxes during the past three years for speeches and excessive deductions for improper treatment of accounting fees on his sports games. Besides that, the Daily News states that he pocketed thousands of dollars in campaign cash from city developers whose projects he approved or funded with taxpayers money. The committee said he deducted too much for purchase of season tickets to Dallas Maverick’s professional basketball games. Kirk’s “mistakes” parallel other high profile appointees that were either threatened or derailed because of tax errors. Former senator Thomas Daschle (Health and Human Services nominee (D-S.D.) failed to pay taxes on wages for his use of a chauffeur.
Obama’s choice to be the chief performance officer, Nancy Killefer, withdrew because of failure to pay employment taxes. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner was confirmed even though he acknowledged he paid $40,000 in back employment taxes only just after being chosen for the position. The Governor of New Mexico, Bill Richardson withdrew from his appointment as Commerce Secretary after a Federal Grand Jury began investigations how a California Company contributed to Richardson’s political activities won a New Mexico Transportation contract worth more than $1 million.
The Cabinet Appointments:
Department of Health and Human Services: Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebellius represents a continuation of the extreme abortion agenda Obama hopes to enact. She is one in a line of abortion activists appointed to positions in the Obama administration: Dawn Johnsen, former legal director of NARAL, was named as assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Council; Ellen Moran, former executive director of the pro-abortion EMILY’s List, was appointed White House Communications director, and Melody Barnes, Obama’s domestic policy advisor, previously served on the boards of both EMILY’S LIST and the Planned Parent Action Fund. These are the who’s who of the Abortion Industry focused on promoting and protecting abortion on demand.[2] President Obama has rescinded the Mexico City Policy, allowing taxpayers funds to go to organizations that perform and promote abortion oversees. The Administration is set to take action to rescind a regulation that enforces federal laws protecting the conscience rights of doctors and other health care providers. The result of this would penalize doctors by removing their licenses, preventing them to practice medicine, if they refuse to commit abortions. This would result in closing Catholic hospitals’ who would never permit abortions and whose surgical doctors’ consciences would never permit committing such an abomination.
CUSTOMS AND BORDER CHIEF OF STAFF: Marco Antonio Lopez, the newly appointed chief of staff of U.S. Customs and Border Protection is a duel citizen (Mexico and the U.S.) The 32 year old former Mayor of Nogales, Arizona was selected to that position by Janet Napolitano who is Homeland Security Secretary. Napolitano, as the former Governor of Arizona blocked every attempt to stem the illegal alien invasion into the state. Her choice to head border protection is a slap in the face of the border patrol agents who really want to stop the traffic flow of illegal aliens.
Obama’s Bilderberger Selections[3]:
1. Timothy Geithner – Treasury Secretary. Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, president and CEO of Federal Reserve Bank of New York, director of policy development for IMF, member Group of Thirty (G30) employed by Kissinger & Associates. Architect of the recent 2008 financial bailouts, mentored by Lawrence Summers and Robert Rubin.
Advertisement
2. Paul Volcker – Economic Recovery Advisory Board. Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, North American Chairman of Trilateral Commission, Federal Reserve Chairman during Carter and Reagan administrations, president of the Reserve Bank of New York, G30 member, chairman Rothschild Wolfensohn Company, key figure in the collapse of the gold standard during the Nixon administration, longtime associate of the Rockefeller family.
3. Rahm Emanuel – Chief of Staff. Member of the Israeli Defense Force, staunch Zionist, former member of the House of Representatives (D-Ill); Board of Directors for Freddie Mac; member of Bill Clinton’s finance campaign committee; made $16.2 million during 2.5 years as an investment banker. His father was a member of the Israeli Irgun terrorist group.
4. Lawrence Summers – National Economic Council. Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, treasury secretary during the Clinton administration, chief economist at the World Bank, former president of Harvard University, Brookings Institute board member, huge proponent of globalization while working for the IMF, protégé of David Rockefeller, mentored Robert Rubin.
5. David Axelrod – Senior Advisor, political consultant whose past clients include Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Christopher Dodd, main Obama fixer in the William Ayers and Reverend Wright scandal.
6. Hillary Clinton – Secretary of State. Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, clandestine CIA asset used to infiltrate the anti-war movement at Yale University and the Watergate hearings, senior partner at the Rose Law Firm, key figure in the Mena drug trafficking affair, architect of the Waco disaster, implicated in the murder/cover-up of Vince Foster, and many other deaths.
7. Joseph Biden – Vice President. Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations. U.S. Senator, since 1972, member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, current chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, strong Zionist sympathizer who recently told Rabbi Mark S, Golub of Shalom TV, “I am a Zionist. You don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist.”
8. Bill Richardson – Commerce Secretary ex-appointee. Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, former U.S. congressman, chairman of the Democratic National Convention in 2004, employee of Kissinger Associates, UN ambassador, present governor of New Mexico, former energy secretary, major player in the Monica Lewinsky cover-up with Bilderberg luminary Vernon Jordan.
9. Robert Gates – Defense Secretary. Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, former CIA Director, defense secretary under President Bush, co-chaired CFR task force with Zbigniew Brzezinski knee-deep in the Iran-Contra scandal, named in a 1999 class action lawsuit pertaining to the Mena drug trafficking affair.
10. Tom Daschle – Former Obama Health Secretary, Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, former senate majority leader, Citibank lackey, mentioned by Robert Rubin.
11. Eric Holder – Attorney General, Key person in the pardon of racketeer Marc Rich, deputy attorney general under Janet Reno, facilitated the pardon of 16 Puerto Rican terrorists under Bill Clinton.
12. Janet Napolitano – Homeland Security Director, Council on Foreign Relations, Arizona governor, attorney for Anita Hill during the Clarence Thomas hearings, U.S. attorney during the Clinton administration, instrumental in the Oklahoma City (OKC) bomb cover-up, where she declared “We’ll pursue every bit of evidence and every lead,” described as another Janet Reno, soft on illegal immigration (i.e. pro- amnesty and driver licenses to illegal aliens).* [She also is pro abortion rights and same sex marriage. [author]
13. Gen. James L. Jones – National Security Advisor, Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, European supreme allied commander, special envoy for Middle-East Security during Bush administration, board of directors for Chevron and Boeing, NATO commander, member of Brent Scowcroft’s Institute for International Affairs along with Zbigniew Brzeziniski, Bobby Ray Inman, Bilderberg luminary Henry Kissinger and former CIA Director John Deutsch (CFR).
14. Susan Rice – U.N. Ambassador, Council on Foreign Relations, Rhodes Scholar, campaign foreign policy advisor to presidential candidates John Kerry and Michael Dukakis, member of Bill Clinton’s National Security Council and assistant secretary of state for Africa, member of the Brookings Institute (funded by the Ford Foundation and the Rockefellers), AND MEMBER OF THE Aspen Strategy Group (teeming with Bilderberg insiders such as Richard Armitage, Brent Scowcroft and Madeleine Albright).
Comment: Earlier in Part I of this essay, I asked the question who really is in charge of the President. Need you or I look no further than the men and women that Barrack Obama appointed to lead the nation? For part one click below.
Click here for part —–> 1,
Footnotes:
1, Fabian Society information found in the Wikipedia Encyclopedia
2, This information is attributed to David N. Osteen, PhD. Executive director of the National Right to Life Committee
3, Permission granted to use information listing Bilderberg members published by the American Free Press Article “Change – Obama Inner Circle Filled With Bilderbergers “ December 22, 2008, issue 51, author, Victor Thorn. He is a hard hitting Journalist of many books on 9-11 and the World Order. Call 1-888-699-NEWS to get a complete list of Thorn’s books.
© 2008 Joe Kress – All Rights Reserved
AUTHOR
The “Curmudgeon,” Joseph H. Kress, Lt. Col. USAF (Ret) obtain a B.S. in Business Administration, with a major in economics and minor in accounting.
He served in England and Viet Nam where he received the Bronze Star during the TET Offensive, then he was appointed Chief of Supply for two state-side assignments; the DOD’s Defense Disposal Agency where he was chief of disposal operations for all of Southeast Asia, based at CINCPAC Headquarters in Hawaii. He retired from Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio as chief of supply with the rank of Lieutenant Colonel at the age of 52, and now he and his wife reside in Summerville, S.C.
Since leaving the military, he was involved in political campaigns, writing articles for the local papers, and as a realtor.
E-mail: jkress@sc.rr.com
9 responses so far ↓
centurean2 // July 11, 2009 at 11:22 am |
Sorry cocked up a little and can’t be bothered to correct.
LABOUR A PARTY FOR WORKING MEN?
LOOK AT IT’S FOUNDERS!
centurean2 // July 11, 2009 at 11:25 am |
Rothschilds & Rockefellers -
Trillionaires Of The World
Learn your history before it repeats on you.
By New World Order
12-3-7
In the last century, members of the British Fabian Society dynastic banking families in the City of London financed the Communist takeover of Russia. Trotsky in his biography refers to some of the loans from these British financiers going back as far as 1907. By 1917 the major subsidies and funding for the Bolshevik Revolution were co-ordinated and arranged by Sir George Buchanan and Lord Alfred Milner. [no doubt using money from Cecil Rhodes' South African gold and diamond legacy - Ed] The Communist system in Russia was a “British experiment” designed ultimately to become the Fabian Socialist model for the British takeover of the World through the UN and EU. The British plan to takeover the World and bring in a “New World Order” began with the teachings of John Ruskin and Cecil Rhodes at Oxford University. Rhodes in one of his wills in 1877 left his vast fortune to Lord Nathan Rothschild as trustee to set up the Rhodes Scholarship Program at Oxford to indoctrinate promising young graduates for the purpose, and also establish a secret society [Royal Institute of International Affairs RIIA, which branched into the Round Table, the Bilderbergers, the CFR, the Trilateral, etc -- Ed] for leading business and banking leaders around the World who would work for the City to bring in their Socialist World government.
Rothschild appointed Lord Alfred Milner to implement the plan.
http://www.rense.com/general79/tril.htm
BROWN LIKE ALL MPs IS ACTING OUT HIS PART IN THE NWO AND YOUR DOWNFALL!!
TAKING YOUR CASH TO GIVE TO FABIAN BANKERS—–BUT THEN HE’S A FABIAN TOO!!
centurean2 // July 11, 2009 at 11:35 am |
By 1917 the major subsidies and funding for the Bolshevik Revolution were co-ordinated and arranged by Sir George Buchanan and Lord Alfred Milner. [no doubt using money from Cecil Rhodes' South African gold and diamond legacy - Ed] The Communist system in Russia was a “British experiment” designed ultimately to become the Fabian Socialist model for the British takeover of the World through the UN and EU. The British plan to takeover the World and bring in a “New World Order” began with the teachings of John Ruskin and Cecil Rhodes at Oxford University.
who fought with the Bolsheviks…….The Menchaviks—-Fabians!!
Hence i call Comrade Brown—–Brownski…
Mandy his Russian Ancestry doing to Britain what the USSR couldn’t!!
And thick Brits vote in their own demise!!!
Trot said-The British needed foreigners to carry out their revolution for them………….and by God we’ve plenty of them in Westminster—Milibands just 2 examples of Marxist Fabians at work!!
Add on the Marxist Chancellor Darling.
The Fabian Spirit
To speak of scientific management in school and society without crediting the influence of the Fabians would do great disservice to truth, but the nature of Fabianism is so complex it raises questions this essay cannot answer. To deal with the Fabians in a brief compass as I’m going to do is to deal necessarily in simplifications in order to see a little how this charming group of scholars, writers, heirs, heiresses, scientists, philosophers, bombazines, gazebos, trust-fund babies, and successful men and women of affairs became the most potent force in the creation of the modern welfare state, distributors of its characteristically dumbed-down version of schooling. Yet pointing only to this often frivolous organization’s eccentricity would be to disrespect the incredible accomplishments of Beatrice Webb and her associates, and their decisive effort on schooling. Mrs. Webb is the only woman ever deemed worthy of burial in Westminster Abbey.
What nineteenth-century Transcendentalists and Muggletonians hoped to be in reordering the triumvirate of society, school, and family, twentieth-century Fabians actually were. Although far from the only potent organization working behind the scenes to radically reshape domestic and international life, it would not be too far out of line to call the twentieth century the Fabian century. One thing is certain: the direction of modern schooling for the bottom 90 percent of our society has followed a largely Fabian design—and the puzzling security and prestige enjoyed at the moment by those who speak of “globalism” and “multiculturalism” are a direct result of heed paid earlier to Fabian prophecies that a welfare state, followed by an intense focus on internationalism, would be the mechanism elevating corporate society over political society, and a necessary precursor to utopia. Fabian theory is the Das Kapital of financial capitalism.
Fabianism always floated above simplistic politics, seeking to preempt both sides. The British Labour Party and its post-WWII welfare state are Fabianism made visible. This is well understood; not so easily comprehended are signs of an aristocratic temper—like this little anti-meritocractic Fabian gem found in a report of the British College of Surgeons:
Medicine would lose immeasurably if the proportion of such students [from upper-class and upper-middle-class homes] were to be reduced in favour of precocious children who qualify for subsidies [i.e., scholarship students].
Even though meritocracy is their reliable cover, social stratification was always the Fabian’s real trump suit. Entitlements are another Fabian insertion into the social fabric, even though the idea antedates them, of course.
To realize the tremendous task Fabians originally assigned themselves (a significant part of which was given to schooling to perform), we need to reflect again on Darwin’s shattering books, The Origin of Species (1859) and The Descent of Man (1871), each arguing in its own way that far from being blank slates, children are written upon indelibly by their race of origin, some “favored” in Darwin’s language, some not. A powerful public relations initiative of recent years has attempted to separate Darwin from “social Darwinism,” but it cannot be done because Darwin himself is the prototypical social Darwinist. Both books taken together issued a license for liberal upper classes to justify forced schooling. From an evolutionary perspective, schools are the indoctrination phase of a gigantic breeding experiment. Working-class fantasies of “self-improvement” were dismissed from the start as sentimentality that evolutionary theory had no place for.
What Darwin accomplished with his books was a freeing of discussion from the narrow straitjacket it had worn when society was considered a matter of internal associations and relationships. Darwin made it possible to consider political affairs as a prime instrument of social evolution. Here was a pivotal moment in Western thought, a changing of the guard in which secular purpose replaced religious purpose, long before trashed by the Enlightenment.
For the poor, the working classes, and middle classes in the American sense,7 this change in outlook, lauded by the most influential minds of the nineteenth century, was a catastrophe of titanic proportions, especially for government schoolchildren. Children could no longer simply be parents’ darlings. Many were (biologically) a racial menace. The rest had to be thought of as soldiers in genetic combat, the moral equivalent of war. For all but a relative handful of favored families, aspiration was off the board as a scientific proposition.
For governments, children could no longer be considered individuals but were regarded as categories, rungs on a biological ladder. Evolutionary science pronounced the majority useless mouths waiting for nature to dispense with entirely. Nature (as expressed through her human agents) was to be understood not as cruel or oppressive but beautifully, functionally purposeful—a neo-pagan perspective to be reflected in the organization and administration of schools.
Three distinct and conflicting tendencies competed in the nineteenth-century theory of society: first was the empirical tendency stemming from John Locke and David Hume which led to that outlook on the study of society we call pragmatism, and eventually to behavioristic psychology; the second line descended from Immanuel Kant, Hegel, Savigny, and others and led to the organic theory of the modern state, the preferred metaphor of Fabians (and many later systems theorists); the third outlook comes to us out of Rousseau, Diderot, d’Alembert, Bentham, the Mills, and leads almost directly to the utilitarian state of Marxist socialism. Each of these postures was savagely assailed over time by the development of academic Darwinism. After Darwin, utopia as a human-friendly place dies an agonizing death. The last conception of utopia after Darwin which isn’t some kind of hellish nightmare is William Morris’ News from Nowhere.
With only niggling reservations, the Fabian brain trust had no difficulty employing force to shape recalcitrant individuals, groups, and organizations. Force in the absence of divine injunctions is a tool to be employed unsentimentally. Fabian George Bernard Shaw established the principle wittily in 1920 when he said that under a Fabian future government:
You would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you like it or not. If it were discovered that you have not character and industry, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner.
- The Intelligent Woman’s Guide to Socialism and Capitalism
Fabianism came into existence around the year 1884, taking its name from Roman general Fabius Cunctator8 who preserved the Roman state by defeating Hannibal, chipping away at Hannibal’s patience and will to win by avoiding combat. Darwin was the weird holy man Fabians adored, the man who gave them their principle, a theory inspirationally equal to god-theory, around which a new organization of society could be justified.
Continues John Taylor Gatto
http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/chapters/9e.htm
centurean2 // July 11, 2009 at 11:39 am |
Wednesday, November 05, 2008
Crimes of The Fabian Socialists
There are an unimaginable number of “conspiracy theories” regarding the New World Order, some with merit, most are simply illogical and without merit. I will not delve into the initial beginning of this “New World Order”, but I begin at a pertinent point in its history that will, hopefully, explain just what they plans have been, how those plans have been implemented and how they will ultimately be defeated by their own plans.
It is vital to understand that the New World Order is inextricably tied to the Fabian Socialists which formed in England during the later part of the 1800s and their intricate plans for a global fascist-socialistic society. In fact, there is no New World Order outside of the Fabian Socialist agenda. It should be remembered that the Fabian Socialists were equally accepted in both the Nazi/Fascist and the Communist/Marxist/Leninist/Maoist/Trotskite ideologies. The Fabians have been, throughout their history, political and social chameleons who have, through stealth and deception, changed their outer skin to infiltrate every political, social and educational institution around the world, particularly in Great Britain and the United States. Speaking of chameleons, the primary symbol of the Fabians is a “wolf wrapped in a sheep’s skin”.
The Fabians, like all socialists, are completely dedicated to the centralization of all power, in all aspects of society and government. Their primary push as been to advance the idea that the power of government, The State, is the center of society. Fabians are not above calling themselves anti-socialist, conservatives, liberals, moderates, or any other name in order to achieve their goals of centralization. They are not above joining any group that can be used to influence official and public opinion to achieve their goals and indeed, they have succeeded over the decades to do just that. The rise of The State, its well-being and the gradual increase in its power is of primary importance to the Fabians over any and all considerations for the individual. Their goal has been to wean the individual away from self-dependence and responsibility toward a dependency on The State and a sense of responsibility toward the “common good”.
Their “silent revolution” undermines a nation from within, deep within the bowels of the society in order accommodate a gradual, incremental transformation into a socialist society. One of the famous Fabians was George Bernard Shaw, the playwright, he stated clearly the techniques the Fabians used: “Our propaganda is one of permeating – we urged our members to join the Liberal and Radical Associations in their district, or, if they preferred it, the Conservative Associations – we permeated the party organizations and pulled all the strings we could lay our hands on with the utmost adroitness and energy, and we succeeded so well that in 1888 we gained the solid advantage of a Progressive majority full of ideas that would never have come into their heads had not the Fabians put them there.”
In 1889, Sidney Webb, another Fabian said:
“The Fabian Society occupies a different sphere as a Socialist Society from that of the two larger bodies. It includes members of all the other organizations, with a number of active workers chiefly of the middle class, and ‘literary proletariat’. . . . The Society exercises a considerable influence, more real than apparent, by the personal participation of its members in nearly all reform movements, as well as by their work at the Universities and in the fields of journalism and the teaching of Political Economy. It is not, however, a numerous body, and makes no attempt to increase its numbers beyond a convenient limit.”
In his book The New Despotism, Lord Hewart, written in 1929, revealed the serious nature of the Fabians involvement in the British government: “A mass of evidence establishes the fact that there is in existence a persistent and well-contrived system, intending to produce, and in practice producing, a despotic power which at one and the same time places Government departments beyond the sovereignty of Parliament and beyond the jurisdiction of the Courts.”
It is evident that the expansion of the Fabian Socialist Plan has been successfully extended to the United States with the primary push during the Administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt in the 30s and 40s. Needless to say, the Fabians had a direct influence on Woodrow Wilson and the creation of several pieces of legislation, including the Federal Reserve Act, as well as the 16th and 17th Amendments; all of which set the stage for every component for the future implementation of the Fabian Plan. The primary influence on Wilson was Colonel Edward Mandell House, the Fabian who was influential in the founding of the Council on Foreign Relations along with the bankers: J. P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Bernard Baruch, Otto Kahn, Jacob Schiff and Paul Warburg. As we know, House was also heavily involved with the creation of the Federal Reserve Bank, the Round Table Group and the forerunner of the United Nations, the League of Nations. All, each and every one of these institutions, including any ancillary organizations, is completely Fabian in concept, ideology and agenda.
“The crisis [the Great Depression] discovered a great man in Franklin Roosevelt…None too soon he has carried America forward to the second stage of democratic realization. His New Deal involves such collective controls of the national business that it would be absurd to call it anything but socialism, were it not for a prejudice lingering on from the old individualist days against that word…Both Roosevelt and Stalin were attempting to produce a huge, modern, scientifically organized, socialist state, the one out of a warning crisis and the other out of a chaos…” H.G. Wells The Fate of Man 1939
Now, another extremely important point of understanding of the Fabian Socialist can be found in a book by Colonel House called Philip Dru: Administrator. In this book Colonel House describes the political agenda of the Fabians in the implementation of the New World Order under the Administration of the Fabian Socialists. It is a very scary scenario and the strategies found in this book have been enacted, step by step, stage by stage, ever since it was written. Within it can be found the plan of having a small, select group of powerful insiders causing a depression which compels the country to elect a man who just happens to talk to the people in what is called “fireside chats” in which this newly elected president will introduce and launch a plan called “The New Era”.[now remember this book was written in 1912] From that point, these insiders [Fabians]control the government, control the banks and corporations, weaken the country to the point that there is a very real chance of society splitting in civil war, at which point a dictatorship is imposed on the justification of keeping the country together. The character in the book that assumes dictatorial power is named Philip Dru, the Administrator.
There is absolutely no doubt that the implementation of the New Deal was nothing more than that of the Fabian Socialist Plan. The Fabian Political and Economic Planning Committee proved indispensable in the formation of the New Deal, in fact if you read what the New Deal accomplished and compare it to the Fabian P.E.P. they are almost indistinguishable from each other. A portion of the Fabian P.E.P. stated: “The individualistic manufacturer and farmer will be forced by events to submit to far-reaching changes in outlook and methods. What is required, if with only a view to equitable treatment of individuals, is transfer of ownership of large blocks of land – not necessarily of all the land in the country, but certainly a large proportion of it – into the hands of the proposed statutory corporations and public utility bodies and of land trusts.”
Another principal instrument used in the New Deal creation was the monetary and economic policies proposed by John Maynard Keynes and the Marxist Dexter White. White, of course, played a primary role in the development of the Bretton Woods Agreement in 1944 and the establishment of the IMF. In fact, White was later appointed the Director of the IMF by President Truman.
The great American Patriot John T. Flynn stated in his book entitled The Road Ahead that there was a “creeping revolution” taking place in the United States and made a clear connection between Fascism and Fabian Socialism when he said: “. . . the line between Fascism and Fabian Socialism is very thin. Fabian Socialism is the dream. Fascism is Fabian Socialism plus the inevitable dictator.”
The Fabian Socialist have intentionally presented their ideology within a very socially acceptable package; humanitarian in appearance and approach, its actual purpose is complete, absolute power over society as administered through an iron fist covered in a kid-skin glove.
John Maynard Keynes promoted his services as a capitalist economist, but the reality of his politics and his economics were far from capitalistic. One Fabian Socialist by the name of John Strachey was very clear about the true intentions of Keynesian Economics and monetary policy. He proposed Keynesian policies as “an indispensable step in the right direction. The fact that the loss of objectivity, and the intrinsic value of the currency which is involved (i.e., inflation) will sooner or later make necessary, on pain of ever-increasing dislocation, a growing degree of social control . . . for the partial character of the policy will itself lead on to further measures. The very fact that no stability, no permanently workable solution can be found within the limits of this policy will ensure that once a community has been driven by events to tackle its problems, in this way, it cannot halt at the first stage, but must of necessity push on to more thorough going measures of re-organization.”
Keynes stated: “Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the Capitalist System was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security, but at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth. Those to whom the system brings windfalls, beyond their deserts and even beyond their expectations or desires, become ‘profiteers,’ who are the object of the hatred of the bourgeoisie, whom the inflationism has impoverished, not less than of the proletariat. As the inflation proceeds and the real value of the currency fluctuates wildly from month to month, all permanent relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost meaningless; and the process of wealth-getting degenerates into a gamble and a lottery.”
Sounds like a familiar process doesn’t it? The fact is that the Fabians have been in, in one degree or another, control of this country since at least the later part of the 1800s, some may say since 1860 with the nationalist putsch by Lincoln [who was influenced by Marxists from the failed revolution of 1848] and have continued to press their agenda into a Socialist society.
Perhaps one of the most important points to understand is the purpose of the central banking system and the fiat monetary system to the Fabian Socialist New World Order Plan. As explained by H.G. Wells, in his 1930 book entitled The New World Order:
“we grasp this not very obscure truth that there can be, and are, different sorts of money dependent on the economic usages or system inoperable, which are not really interchangeable, then it becomes plain that a collectivist world order, whose fundamental law is such a Declaration of Rights as we have sketched, will have to carry on its main, its primary operations at least with a new world money, a specially contrived money, differing in its nature from any sort of money conventions that have hitherto served human needs. It will be issued against the total purchasable output of the community in return for the workers’ services to the community.”
H.G. Wells described that as a part, one of the primary parts of the Fabian New World Order’s Plan was the contrivance of a monetary system that would be issued, through a central banking system, against the total productive output of the society exchangeable in return for labor. The description is striking because what it denotes is a monetary system where there is no real value to the money itself, in other words a fiat currency, but the “value” would be the production of labor. Now, if you put this together with the quotes from Keynes, you will quickly see that the key to their plan was a highly centralized government with a highly centralized banking system issuing a monetary unit, which through the instrument of inflation, would be reduced from an actual value to a value based solely upon the exchange of labor. This was a truly socialistic concept, that inflation would be used to transform the sound monetary system of the United States into a socialistic monetary system where the exchange rate is the actual labor of the population. Today, that is what we have, our money has no value, but it is exchanged based upon labor.
I realize that many think this current economic down-turn is just the New World Order simply playing the next stage in their plans to impose a complete socialistic society during this latest economic crisis, but in my research I see a very different story. Based on the Fabian Socialist Political and Economic Planning Committee, the New World Order has made no other plans for another monetary system except the Fiat Monetary System and Central Banking System that are now in place and which are now in crisis. I am of the opinion that the New World Order is in trouble, the elite is in trouble because the system that they have spent at least the last 95 years investing all of their power, their time, their resources and intellect in is rapidly approaching a period of time when it will completely collapse. For decades they have pressed their plans, all based on a socialistic vision of creating little more than a feudal system of peonage where the people make up the productive base of their wealth through a system of confiscation and transference from the people themselves into the coffers of the Elite Administrators. Their Socialist Empire is completely built upon and dependent on the continuation of this system; the only system left to them would be a system of complete slavery and that is untenable and totally non-conducive to their plans of Socialism because it would not allow for the continued productive transfer of wealth as the current system allows.
So, as much as these Fabian Elites have put into this system, as much as they seemed to think they could continue the control of the system and extend it globally, they appear to have deluded themselves into thinking that an economic system built solely upon the creation and extension of debt was sustainable indefinitely. The Debt Standard of Fiat Money, based upon labor exchange and debt expansion will collapse, it is a mathematical impossibility for it to continue and with that collapse the Fabian Elite will lose not only their ability to maintain their power, but they will lose their wealth and position in our country and others. Once the collapse of the monetary and economic systems occur, they will have no options left to them, there will be nothing they can do to salvage the system.
There can be no doubt that during this time of collapse the Fabian Socialists will show their true nature, the heart of which is brutal disregard of the individual. They will attempt to put a death grip on society, squeezing as much life as they can from it and will do so in the most extreme ways imaginable. We must however, never relent or retreat from our principles, from our goal of Liberty and Freedom, even when the Fabian New World Order Thugs begin their final oppressive push to retain their power and wealth.
There will be a period of chaos, during this period we must consider the Elite as absolute enemies of the People, of Liberty and Freedom. During that period we must consider such criminals the legitimate focus for the People’s Justice. I personally see no other options but the total and absolute elimination of the sources of this Fabian Socialist plague from our land. Until this land is purged from the influence of this Fabian Socialist Ideology the Constitutional Republic will not be safe for Liberty and Freedom, nor will prosperity ever return as long as they remain a viable force.
Now, I leave you with these horrible thoughts from one of the Fabian Traitors, David Rockefeller: “We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”
In Liberty and Eternal Vigilance,
Republicae
“If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were once our countrymen.”
~ Samuel Adams
“The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them.”~Patrick Henry
“If this be treason, make the most of it!”-Patrick Henry
http://1776solution.blogspot.com/2008/11/crimes-of-fabian-socialists.html
centurean2 // July 11, 2009 at 11:43 am |
The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them.”~Patrick Henry
Labour Party for workers?
Treasury Select Committee chair John McFall had a blunt message for Britain’s bankers at the Fabian Trust and the City debate: “You screwed up and you need to work hard to regain people’s trust.”
McFall, who chaired a high profile select committee investigation into banking failures, argued that change was inevitable. “It doesn’t matter whether it is a Labour government or a Conservative one that is returned, public pressure will bring about change.”
He added: “The neoliberal social contract between the financial services industry has broken down now.”
McFall was joined by Antony Jenkins, head of global financial giant Barclaycard, and Rachel Reeves, a former Bank of England economist and Labour PPC for Leeds West.
Reeves was in agreement with McFall, arguing that “during the years of the boom, the values that underpinned trust have gone out of the window”. The principles of honesty and integrity had been lost, said Reeves, with much of the financial sector believing that ‘compliance’ and ‘ethics’ were the same thing.
Jenkins recognised the depth of bad feeling that his industry faces: “The public have lost trust because they believe that senior bank executives were greedy, self-interested and, worse, were incompetent. We understand why they feel that. Banks have to acknowledge that we have made mistakes”.
He stressed that the City does not simply face a “PR problem”.
“Anybody who takes that view is incredibly naive… We are going to have to change to restore trust. We recognise that if we do not get this right our business is going to be curtailed. If we don’t get it right, we won’t have a business”.
The panel agreed that a more principled financial model was needed.
Reeves set out several measures for a reform agenda to rebuild trust, including: the publication of the minutes of remuneration committees; shareholder votes not simply being indicative; credit ratings agencies being reformed so investors rather than lenders were paying the fees to avoid conflicts of interest; and a review of the taxation policies towards banks and executive pay.
Bankers’ remuneration was a running topic throughout the debate. Proposed ideas included not just the publication of remuneration committee minutes, but having ordinary bank employees included on the remuneration boards.
However, Anthony Jenkins of Barclaycard argued that it was more important for financial institutions to articulate the principles which underpinned their pay policies in a way which “meets the smell test for the public: is this fair?”
http://www.fabians.org.uk/general-news/general-news/mcfall-trust-city-finance
centurean2 // July 11, 2009 at 11:46 am |
War Mongering Central Bankers Own “The State” i.e. the Component
Parts that Comprise “World”
“Money is the god of our times, and Rothschild is his prophet.”
“The few who can understand the system will be either so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favours, that there will be no opposition from that class, while, on the other hand, that great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that Capital derives from the system, will bear its burden without complaint and, perhaps, without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests.”
The True Evil Doers!
“Money is power or shall we say, the monopoly to create credit money and charge interest is absolute power” : Alex James
“Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who makes its laws”: Amschel Bauer Mayer Rothschild, 1838
Letter written from London by the Rothschilds to their New York agents introducing their banking method into America: “The few who can understand the system will be either so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favours, that there will be no opposition from that class, while, on the other hand, that great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that Capital derives from the system, will bear its burden without complaint and, perhaps, without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests.”
Nathan Rothschild said to the Commons Secret Committee on the question early in 1819: “In what line of business are you? – Mostly in the foreign banking line. “Have the goodness to state to the Committee in detail, what you conceive would be the consequence of an obligation imposed upon the Bank [of England, which he owned] to resume cash payments at the expiration of a year from the present time? – I do not think it can be done without very great distress to this country; it would do a great deal of mischief; we may not actually know ourselves what mischief it might cause. “Have the goodness to explain the nature of the mischief, and in what way it would be produced? – Money will be so very scarce, every article in this country will fall to such an enormous extent, that many persons will be ruined.”
The director of the Prussian Treasury wrote on a visit to London that Nathan Rothschild had as early as 1817: “.., incredible influence upon all financial affairs here in London. It is widely stated.., that he entirely regulates the rate of exchange in the City. His power as a banker is enormous”.
Austrian Prince Mettemich’s secretary wrote of the Rothschilds, as early as 1818, that: “… they are the richest people in Europe.”
Referring to James Rothschild, the poet Heinrich Heine said: “Money is the god of our times, and Rothschild is his prophet.”
James Rothschild built his fabulous mansion, called Ferrilres, 19 miles north-east of Paris. Wilhelm I, on first seeing it, exclaimed: “Kings couldn’t afford this. It could only belong to a Rothschild!”
Author Frederic Morton wrote that the Rothschilds had: “conquered the World more thoroughly, more cunningly, and much more lastingly than all the Caesars before…”
As Napoleon pointed out: “Terrorism, War & Bankruptcy are caused by the privatization of money, issued as a debt and compounded by interest “- he cancelled debt and interest in France – hence the Battle of Waterloo.
Some writers have claimed that Nathan Rothschild “warned that the United States would find itself involved in a most disastrous war if the bank’s charter were not renewed.” (do you see the similarities here? If you don’t play the game an economic disaster will fall on you and you will be destroyed.)
“There is but one power in Europe and that is Rothschild.” 19th century French commentator.
Lord Rothschild (Rockefellers and Rothschilds’ relatives) in his book The Shadow of a Great Man quotes a letter sent from Davidson on June 24, 1814 to Nathan Rothschild, “As long as a house is like yours, and as long as you work together with your brothers, not a house in the world will be able to compete with you, to cause you harm or to take advantage of you, for together you can undertake and perform more than any house in the world.” The closeness of the Rothschild brothers is seen in a letter from Soloman (Salmon) Rothschild to his brother Nathan on Feb. 28, 1815, “We are like the mechanism of a watch: each part is essential.” (2) This closeness is further seen in that of the 18 marriages made by Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s grandchildren – 16 were contracted between first cousins.
“Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.” The Communist Manifesto. In the case of the Bolshevik revolution, Rothschilds/ Rockefellers’ Chase Bank owned the state. In the US, the FED owners “own” the state.
Rothschilds’ favorite saying who along with the Rockefellers are the major Illuminati Banking Dynasties: “Who controls the issuance of money controls the government!”
Nathan Rothschild said (1777-1836): “I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire. The man who controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire and I control the British money supply.”
Rockefeller is reported to have said: “Competition is a sin”. “Own nothing. Control everything”. Because he wants to centralize control of everything and enslave us all, i.e. the modern Nimrod or Pharaoh.
The Rothschild were behind the colonization and occupations of India and the Rothschild owned British Petroleum was granted unlimited rights to all offshore Indian oil, which is still valid till this day.
“Give me the control of the credit of a nation, and I care not who makes the laws.” The famous boastful statement of Nathaniel Meyer Rothschild, speaking to a group of international bankers, 1912: “The few who could understand the system (cheque, money, credits) will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favours, that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests.” The boastful statement by Rothschild Bros. of London.
These people are the top masterminds and conspired for the creation of illegal FEDERAL RESERVE BANK in 1913: Theodore Roosevelt, Paul Warburg – Representative Of Rothschild, Woodrow Wilson – U.S. President Signed FED Into Act, Nelson W. Aldrich – Representative Of Rockefeller, Benjamin Strong – Representative Of Rockefeller, Frank A. Vanderlip – Representative Of Rockefeller, John D. Rockefeller – Rockefeller Himself, Henry Davison – Representative Of J. P. Morgan, Charles Norton – Representative Of J. P. Morgan.
In the last century, members of the British Fabian Society dynastic banking families in the City of London financed the Communist takeover of Russia. Trotsky in his biography refers to some of the loans from these British financiers going back as far as 1907. By 1917 the major subsidies and funding for the Bolshevik Revolution were co-ordinated and arranged by Sir George Buchanan and Lord Alfred Milner. [no doubt using money from Cecil Rhodes' South African gold and diamond legacy - Ed] The Communist system in Russia was a “British experiment” designed ultimately to become the Fabian Socialist model for the British takeover of the World through the UN and EU. The British plan to takeover the World and bring in a “New World Order” began with the teachings of John Ruskin and Cecil Rhodes at Oxford University. Rhodes in one of his wills in 1877 left his vast fortune to Lord Nathan Rothschild as trustee to set up the Rhodes Scholarship Program at Oxford to indoctrinate promising young graduates for the purpose, and also establish a secret society [Royal Institute of International Affairs RIIA, which branched into the Round Table, the Bilderbergers, the CFR, the Trilateral, etc -- Ed] for leading business and banking leaders around the World who would work for the City to bring in their Socialist World government.
Rothschild appointed Lord Alfred Milner to implement the plan.
Benjamin Freedman (Friedman) said this in 1961, Washington (he was a millionaire insider in international Zionist organizations, friend to 4 US presidents, and was also part of the 117-man strong Zionist delegation at the signing of the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 where Germany was forced into bankruptcy to the Zionist BankLords and social chaos): “Two years into WW1, Germany, which was then winning the war, offered Britain and France a negotiated peace deal, but German Zionist groups seeing the opportunity made a deal with Britain to get the United States into the war if Britain promised to give the Zionists Palestine.”
In other words, they made this deal: “We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay us is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.” They made that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that — I don’t know how many here remember it — the United States, which was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers and mass communications media here were controlled by the Zionist bankers who owned the major commercial banks and the 12 Federal Reserve Banks (the original Stockholders of the Federal Reserve Banks in 1913 were the Rockefeller’ s, JP Morgan, Rothschild’s, Lazard Freres, Schoellkopf, Kuhn-Loeb, Warburgs, Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs, all with roots in Germany’s Zionists like the British Royal family, J.P. Morgan, Carnegie, Bush, Rumsfeld, Clintons, the Nazis that were brought into the CIA, etc. http://land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/federal_reserve.shtml ) and they were pro-German because they wanted to use Germany to destroy the Czar of Russia and let the Communists whom they funded take over. The German Zionist bankers — Rothschilds, Rockefeller, Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: “As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!” They poured money into Germany, fighting with Germany against Russia, to lick the Czarist regime. The newspapers had been all pro-German, where they’d been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, then after making the deal with the British for Palestine, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies’ hands. And they were no good. The Zionists in London sent cables to the US, to Justice Brandeis: “Go to work on President Wilson. We’re getting from England what we want. Now you go to work, and you go to work on President Wilson and get the US into the war.” And that did happen. Shortly after President Woodrow Wilson declared war on Germany.
The power of the Rothschild family was evidenced on 24 Sept 2002 when a helicopter touched down on the lawn of Waddedson Manor, their ancestral home in Buckinghamshire, England. Out of the helicopter strode Warren Buffet, – touted as the second richest man in the World but really a lower ranking player- and Arnold Schwarzenegger (the gropinator), at that time a candidate for the Governorship of California. Also in attendance at this two day meeting of the World’s most powerful businessmen and financiers hosted by Jacob Rothschild were James Wolfensohn, president of the World Bank and Nicky Oppenheimer, chairman of De Beers. Arnold went on to secure the governorship of one of the biggest economies on the planet a year later. That he was initiated into the ruling class in the Rothschilds’ English country manor suggests that the centre of gravity of the three hundred trillion dollar cartel is in the U.K. and Europe not the U.S.
A recent article in the London Financial Times indicates why it is impossible to gain an accurate estimate of the wealth of the trillionaire bankers. Discussing the sale of Evelyn Rothschild’s stake in Rothschild Continuation Holdings, it states: …[this] requires agreement on the valuation of privately held assets whose value has never been tested in a public market. Most of these assets are held in a complex network of tax-efficient structures around the World.
Queen Elizabeth II’s shareholdings remain hidden behind Bank of England Nominee accounts. The Guardian newspaper reported in May 2002 … “the reason for the wild variations in valuations of her private wealth can be pinned on the secrecy over her portfolio of share investments. This is because her subjects have no way of knowing through a public register of interests where she, as their head of state, chooses to invest her money. Unlike the members of the Commons and now the Lords, the Queen does not have to annually declare her interests and as a result her subjects cannot question her or know about potential conflicts of interests…” In fact, the Queen even has an extra mechanism to ensure that her investments remain secret – a nominee company called the Bank of England Nominees. It has been available for decades to the entire World’s current heads of state to allow them anonymity when buying shares. Therefore, when a company publishes a share register and the Bank of England Nominees is listed, it is not possible to gauge whether the Queen, President Bush or even Saddam Hussein is the true shareholder.
By this method, the trillionaire masters of the universe remain hidden whilst Forbes magazine poses lower ranking billionaires like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett as the richest men in the World. Retired management consultant Gaylon Ross Sr, author of Who’s Who of the Global Elite, has been tipped from a private source that the combined wealth of the Rockefeller family in 1998 was approx (US) $11 trillion and the Rothschilds (U.S.) $100 trillion. However something of an insider’s knowledge of the hidden wealth of the elite is contained in the article, “Will the Dollar and America Fall Down on August 19?..” on page 1 of the 12th July 2001 issue of Russian newspaper Pravda. The newspaper interviewed Tatyana Koryagina, a senior research fellow in the Institute of Macroeconomic Researches subordinated to the Russian Ministry of Economic Development (Minekonom) on the subject of a recent conference concerning the fate of the U.S. economy:
Koryagina: The known history of civilization is merely the visible part of the iceberg. There is a shadow economy, shadow politics and also a shadow history, known to conspirologists. There are [unseen] forces acting in the World, unstoppable for [most powerful] countries and even continents.
Ashley Mote (EU): “Mr President, I wish to draw your attention to the Global Security Fund, set up in the early 1990s under the auspices of Jacob Rothschild. This is a Brussels-based fund and it is no ordinary fund: it does not trade, it is not listed and it has a totally different purpose. It is being used for geopolitical engineering purposes, apparently under the guidance of the intelligence services.” “I have previously asked about the alleged involvement of the European Union’s own intelligence resources in the management of slush funds in offshore accounts, and I still await a reply. To that question I now add another: what are the European Union’s connections to the Global Security Fund and what relationship does it have with European Union institutions? “Recently, Ashley Mote of the European Union (EU) asked this volatile question in a public EU meeting, a question never answered, as Mr. Mote, merely by asking this question, was immediately scratched from the White House Christmas card list and placed on its top ten hit list. The Illuminati’s cash cow, grazing freely on the World wide pasture of greenbacks, isn’t called “Elsie” but instead is called the Global Security Fund, a name actually meaning in the secret cult’s language Global Terrorist Fund. In simple terms, it’s a gigantic illegal trust fund, estimated by undercover overseas financial investigators at 65 trillion dollars, set-up for “Illuminati rainy days” and established when it is desperately needed in a pinch for bribery, assassinations and sponsoring World wide terrorist activities to divert attention from their banking mafia. Although the fund is cloaked in secrecy and made possible by the Western civilization’ s Federal Reserve banking system, investigators trying to pry into the Illuminati’s secret treasure trove have uncovered some interesting facts.
http://www.rense.com/general79/tril.htm
“Bankers Make Wars to Create Debt”
“Who Rules your Rulers?”
Author, Researcher, Historian Eustace Mullins on the “Federal” Reserve System
and Other Creations of the Global Crime Syndicate aka the Central Bankers
More Background Here:
http://www.planetization.banishusury.htm
http://www.planetization.org/debtspider.htm
http://www.planetization.org/zionistbanksters.htm
centurean2 // July 11, 2009 at 11:51 am |
Barack Obama, Fabian Socialist
Jerry Bowyer 11.03.08, 12:32 PM ET
Barack Obama is a Fabian socialist. I should know; I was raised by one. My Grandfather worked as a union machinist for Ingersoll Rand during the day. In the evenings he tended bar and read books. After his funeral, I went back home and started working my way through his library, starting with T.W. Arnold’s The Folklore of Capitalism. This was my introduction to the Fabian socialists.
Fabians believed in gradual nationalization of the economy through manipulation of the democratic process. Breaking away from the violent revolutionary socialists of their day, they thought that the only real way to effect “fundamental change” and “social justice” was through a mass movement of the working classes presided over by intellectual and cultural elites. Before TV it was stage plays, written by George Bernard Shaw and thousands of inferior “realist” playwrights dedicated to social change. John Cusack’s character in Woody Allen’s “Bullets Over Broadway” captures the movement rather well.
Arnold taught me to question everyone–my president, my priest and my parents. Well, almost everyone. I wasn’t supposed to question the Fabian intellectuals themselves. That’s the Fabian MO, relentless cultural and journalistic attacks on everything that is, and then a hard pitch for the hope of what might be.
That’s Obama’s world.
He’s telling the truth when he says that he doesn’t agree with Bill Ayers’ violent bombing tactics, but it’s a tactical disagreement. Why use dynamite when mass media and community organizing work so much better? Who needs Molotov when you’ve got Saul Alinski?
So here is the playbook: The left will identify, freeze, personalize and polarize an industry, probably health care. It will attempt to nationalize one-fifth of the U.S. economy through legislative action. They will focus, as Lenin did, on the “commanding heights” of the economy, not the little guy.
As Obama said, “the smallest” businesses will be exempt from fines for not “doing the right thing” in offering employer-based health care coverage. Health will not be nationalized in one fell swoop; they have been studying the failures of Hillary Care. Instead, a parallel system will be created, funded by surcharges on business payroll, which will be superior to many private plans.
The old system will be forced to subsidize the new system and there will be a gradual shift from the former to the latter. The only coercion will be the fines, not the participation. A middle-class entitlement will have been created.
It may not be health care first; it might be energy, though I suspect that energy will be nationalized much more gradually. The offshore drilling ban that was allowed to lapse legislatively will be reinstated through executive means. It may be an executive order, but might just as well be a permit reviewing system that theoretically allows drilling but with endless levels of objection and appeal from anti-growth groups. Wind and solar, on the other hand, will have no permitting problems at all, and a heavy taxpayer subsidy at their backs.
The banking system has already been partially nationalized. Bush and Paulson intend for their share purchases to be only non-voting preferred shares, but the law does not specify that. How hard will it be for Obama, new holder of $700 billion in bank equity, to demand “accountability” and a “voice” for the taxpayers?
The capital markets are not freezing up now, mostly because of what has happened, although community organizers’ multidecade push for affirmative-action mortgages has done enormous harm to the credit system. Markets are forward looking.
A quick review of the socialist takeovers in Venezuela in 1999, Spain in 2004 and Italy in 2006 show the same pattern–equity markets do most of their plummeting before the Chavez’s of the world take power. Investors anticipate the policy shift in advance; that’s their job.
It’s not just equity markets, though; debt markets do the same thing. Everywhere I turn I hear complaints about bankers “hoarding” capital. “Hoarding” is a word we’ve heard often from violent socialists like Lenin and Mao. We also hear it from the democratic left as we did during the 1930s in America. The banks, we’re told, are greedy and miserly, holding onto capital that should be deployed into the marketplace.
Well, which is it, miserly or greedy? They’re not the same thing. Banks make money borrowing low and lending high. In fact, they can borrow very, very low right now, as they could during the Great Depression.
So why don’t they lend? Because socialism is a very unkind environment for lenders. Some of the most powerful members of Congress are speaking openly about repudiating mortgage covenants. Local officials have already done so by simply refusing to foreclose on highly delinquent borrowers. Then, there’s the oldest form of debt repudiation, inflation. Even if you get your money back, it will not be worth anything. Who would want to lend in an environment like this?
Will Obama’s be the strong-man socialism of a Chavez, or the soft socialism that Clement Atlee used to defeat Churchill after WWII? I don’t know, but I suspect something kind of in between. Despite right-wing predictions that we won’t see Rush shut down by Fairness Doctrine fascists. We won’t see Baptist ministers hauled off in handcuffs for anti-sodomy sermons. It will more likely be a matter of paperwork. Strong worded letters from powerful lawyers in and out of government to program directors and general mangers of radio stations. Ominous references to license renewal.
The psychic propaganda assault will be powerful. The cyber-brown-shirts will spew hate, the union guys will flood talk shows with switchboard-collapsing swarms of complaint calls aimed at those hosts who “go beyond the pale” in their criticisms of Obama. In concert with pop culture outlets like The Daily Show and SNL, Obama will use his podium to humiliate and demonize those of us who don’t want to come together and heal the planet.
You’ve heard of the bully pulpit, right? Well, then get ready, because you’re about to see the bully part.
Jerry Bowyer is chief economist of Benchmark Financial Network and a CNBC contributor.
written a day before Obama was elected to become president…
http://baylorfans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=171930
centurean2 // July 11, 2009 at 12:02 pm |
Obama didn’t wait too long!
Obama Administration Silences Critics With Intimidation
The Advocate
By Herb Denenberg, The Bulletin
Thursday, May 14, 2009
The White House correspondents and President Barack Obama demonstrated they were a tasteless, classless bunch at the recent White House Correspondents’ Dinner.
They demonstrated that by laughing at a parade of tasteless, classless jokes that, among other things, wished kidney failure for Rush Limbaugh, made fun of his history of addiction to painkillers and suggested he might have been the 20th hijacker involved in 9/11. Karl Rove put it this way, describing those comments as “mean, vicious and nasty.” But perhaps the most devastating criticism of comedian Wanda Sykes was that her jokes weren’t funny.
This disgraceful demonstration was compounded by Robert Gibbs, White House spokesman, who was given a chance to distance himself from these tasteless, classless comments. But at the following White House briefing, he failed to do so, limiting himself to the 9/11 comment. He suggested it was not an appropriate subject for humor. But he made no comment on the rest of the scenario.
In addition to hitting new lows in tastelessness and classlessness, there was another revealing twist about this year’s dinner. In the past, the dinners have been a roast of the president. This year, the roast was of the president’s critics.
This is just one more indication of how deep into the Obama tank the White House correspondents are — they can’t even make jokes about the Messiah, the Savior, and the Anointed One also known as Barack Hussein Obama. I don’t know what’s worse — the White House correspondents believing he is the Messiah or Mr. Obama’s apparent belief in that status.
But we can survive the tasteless and classless. What we can’t survive is the Obama administration’s attempt to silence their critics and dismantle the First Amendment and its guarantee of freedom of speech. This is becoming obvious in the Democratic Party’s support of the Fairness Doctrine, which is in fact a way to destroy conservative talk radio.
The Fairness Doctrine, which should be renamed the Unfairness Doctrine, does that by subjecting talk radio to government regulation via the Fairness Doctrine and by requiring the presentation of both sides of all issues. That’s just a way to make conservative talk radio as we know it disappear. When we had the Fairness Doctrine, there were few talk stations. Now there are about 2,000.
Under the Fairness Doctrine, the regulatory requirements simply strangled anyone who wanted to present lively talk radio by making that business model a losing proposition, forcing uneconomic changes in format and requiring economically damaging regulation.
Unless you’ve gone through death by regulation, you may not realize how focused regulation can drown a business in reporting requirements, bureaucratic directives and regulations, investigations, legal challenges and legal fees. This is true with even greater force when a president decides to use regulation, such as the Fairness Doctrine, to punish a business.
The market wants conservative talk radio, with its constellation of stars such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glen Beck, Michael Medved, Dennis Prager, Bill Bennett, Laura Ingraham, Michael Savage, Hugh Hewitt, Mike Gallagher, Mark Levin, Monica Crowley and many more.
The liberals haven’t been able to produce that kind of radio firepower. They can’t compete in the open market of opinion, so they want to destroy conservative talk radio by government regulation in the form of the Fairness Doctrine, or some variation of it to insert toxic regulatory requirement into the radio environment.
The Fairness Doctrine is outrageous on its face, as it amounts to government regulation of radio content, something that would not even be thought of for newspapers, and should be considered to be unconstitutional for any of the media.
There’s a new and important book that makes the case against the Fairness Doctrine by Brian Jennings, titled Censorship: The Threat to Silence Talk Radio: The ‘New’ Fairness Doctrine Exposed. The title gets the message across. The Fairness Doctrine is just a fancy roundabout method of censoring conservative talk radio. Mr. Jennings makes an ironclad case against the Fairness Doctrine, but I found one of the most interesting parts of the book involved a chapter titled Obama Weighs In: Our New President’s History of Censorship. The chapter documents Mr. Obama’s record showing affinity for censorship, disrespect of the First Amendment and improper intimidation to suppress critics.
Many moves of the Democrats and the Obama administration are designed to improperly silence their critics. I had a strong feeling that there was a dangerous tendency of the Obama administration and the Democrats to suppress free speech and some of our other freedoms.
Democratic Party support for the Fairness Doctrine, a thinly disguised form of censorship, was only one of many signs. Another sign was support for card check legislation, which would virtually abolish the secret ballot in employee elections to authorize unions. But these are not isolated examples, but part of an anti-democratic, anti-freedom trend.
Here are further examples of that trend cataloged by Mr. Jennings:
Obama Intimidation Tactics Against A Radio Station
During the campaign, when a leading critic of Mr. Obama, Stanley Kurtz, was scheduled to appear on a Chicago radio station to discuss Mr. Obama’s association with a famous terrorist, the Obama campaign objected to giving a voice to a critic. Mr. Kurtz was leading the way in documenting the close association between Mr. Obama and terrorist William Ayers.
Mr. Jennings writes, “They wanted to intimidate WGN [the radio station involved] and force management to reverse its decision to put Kurtz on the air. They urged their supporters to send intimidating e-mails and make phone calls to WGN to complain. The station was deluged with calls and e-mails.”
What makes this worse is that the Obama campaign was invited to come onto the program with the critic and present their side of the story. They refused the offer and continued their intimidating tactics to prevent the critic from being heard. The WGN program director said they didn’t want to air their side of the story: “Instead, they e-blasted their national database to clog our call-in lines.” Instead of debate, they chose intimidation.
A few weeks later, the author of one of the leading books on Mr. Obama, David Freddoso, was also scheduled to discuss his book, The Case Against Barack Obama. Again, the Obama campaign adopted the same tactics to silence this critic. The author of the Broadcaster Freedom Act, Congressman Mike Pence, R-Ind., a key opponent of the Fairness Doctrine in Congress, summarized the situation:
“[WGN] is the most powerful talk station in Illinois, if not the Central region of the Midwest, and to suggest that a Presidential campaign should be throwing its weight around and telling a radio station whom they can and cannot interview — to me it’s a bit of a precursor to what Democrats want to do with the Fairness Doctrine. I think the only people who should be making decisions about what thrives on the broadcast airwaves are the American people.”
Biden Blacklists Radio Stations That Ask Tough Questions
Then-candidate for vice president Sen. Joe Biden was interviewed by a Florida radio station. He was unhappy with the questions, even though they were perfectly legitimate and were questions the American people deserved answers to. Nonetheless, Mr. Biden had his staff cancel an interview by the station of his wife. Mr. Jennings writes,
“Here, again, is another direct assault on the free press by the elected administration. The American electorate was deprived of access to insights that could help them cast an informed vote on November 4, 2008.”
Silence Critics By Threatening Prosecution
The Obama campaign showed that it was willing to do anything when it teamed with prosecutors to silence critics. Mr. Jennings writes,
“Another shocking case of intimidation occurred in St. Louis when a television station reported that prosecutors and law enforcement officials in Missouri had joined in an effort to act as ‘truth squads’ assigned to target the John McCain presidential campaign and any organization that ran radio and television ads critical of Obama.
“The report included a short interview with City Prosecutor Jennifer Joyce, who stated, ‘We don’t want people to get distracted, and Missourians don’t want to be distracted, by these divisive character attacks. So, we’re here to respond to any character attacks, to set the record straight.’ ”
The governor of Missouri said this use of prosecutors to silence political critics was a scandal beyond words. He said Mr. Obama and the prosecutors were trampling on the “most sacred principles and ideas of Jefferson.”
Other Intimidation Tactics
In Tennessee, the state Republican Party had to encourage broadcasters to remain strong against intimidation efforts by the Obama campaign to prevent radio and television ads connecting Mr. Obama to terrorist Mr. Ayers.
The Attack On Joe The Plumber
Joe the Plumber asked then-candidate Mr. Obama a question, to which Mr. Obama replied that he thought it was a good idea to spread the wealth around. For simply asking a question, Joe became the target of harassment, investigation and smearing of all types. The Obama people apparently thought they were being hurt by Joe’s question and the answer it elicited. So they felt they had to destroy him.
The Obama people, by their treatment of Joe, sent a message that you exercise your right of free speech at your peril if you ask Mr. Obama a tough question.
Obama And ACORN
Mr. Jennings should have added Mr. Obama’s association with ACORN, a community organization known for intimidation tactics and even voter fraud. It is now under indictment, and is now viewed as a criminal organization. There have been countless ACORN employees indicted for voter fraud, but a May 2009 indictment in Nevada is directed against the organization itself. Mr. Obama’s association with ACORN goes all the way back to the early years of his working career and included an association during the campaign, when Mr. Obama used ACORN to register voters. Despite its sorry record, it gets federal money and is being used in the Census.
Mr. Jennings makes the point that without conservative talk radio, the public would have had an even smaller chance of getting information about important stories ignored by the biased, dishonest and fraudulent mainstream media. He also indicates in view of the Obama history of censorship and intimidation of critics, the public better be on alert for the possible implementation of the Fairness Doctrine, some variations of it, or other methods of silencing conservative talk radio.
What Can You Do
Write your congressmen and urge them to vote for The Broadcaster Freedom Act (H.R. 2905 in the House and S.1748 in the Senate). Let them know you see the Fairness Doctrine as a threat to freedom of speech and urge them to oppose any attempt to revive the Fairness Doctrine or any of its variations.
Support groups that have a record of fighting the Fairness Doctrine, such as Accuracy in Media. It has a publication on the Fairness Doctrine by Kincaid & Woolley titled The Death of Talk Radio? It also maintains the Web site running a national effort to boycott the biased, fraudulent and dishonest New York Times — http://www.boycottnyt.com
Get into the battle against the other attempts to destroy American values and freedoms. For example, let your congressmen know that you oppose the so-card Card Check Bill, which would virtually abolish the secret ballot in union authorization elections. The bill would also permit federal arbitrators to dictate employment contracts when negotiations reach an impasse. This is an unacceptable takeover of management by these federally appointed arbitrators.
I’d also recommend you get more involved in political battles, as what is going on in Washington, D.C. right now is going to determine whether the greatest nation in the history of the world continues to thrive and prosper or actually perishes. The threat to this nation has never been at a higher level, and the urgency of citizen participation has never been more important.
Herb Denenberg is a former Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commissioner, and professor at the Wharton School. He is a longtime Philadelphia journalist and consumer advocate. He is also a member of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of the Sciences. His column appears daily in The Bulletin. You can reach him at advocate@thebulletin.us.
http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/05/14/herb_denenberg/doc4a0b972d2e1bc227583420.txt
Last night- the LBC host called him Saint Obama———-A journo that has no right to be an host……….imagine had her type been relied on pre ww2.
Oh–and she also said–Islamists were nothing to do with islam or muslims..
Ur idiot what are they then–Goblins with a tendency to hate the west?
Unknown species from nowhere?
Treating us all akin to thick shits!
Fabian Socialists Gone Wild- Wake Up To Your UK Government … | Youth Political Blog // July 11, 2009 at 12:19 pm |
[...] Read the original: Fabian Socialists Gone Wild- Wake Up To Your UK Government … [...]