Centurean2’s Weblog

True Cost Of The Fabians Imports- “ASIAN” Sexually Assaults 79 Year Old Lady- Iraqi Rapes 15 Year Old- Head Butted x Girlfriend-Slashed a guys Face….Round Up Of Cultural Enrichment!!

July 6, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Sunday, July 05, 2009

Cultural Enrichment in Leicester and Nottingham

by Baron Bodissey

 

Cultural Enrichment News
Here are two articles celebrating diversity in England. The first is from the Leicester Mercury (Note: in the British media, “Asian” is a well-known euphemism for Muslim, usually a Pakistani):

Hunt after assault on woman, 79

A 79-year-old woman has been left too “scared” to leave her home after she was sexually assaulted in a city street.

The elderly victim was approached by a man in Upper Tichborne Street, Highfields, Leicester, before he tried to grab her.

After the victim told the man that she was going to call the police he ran off into the nearby Warrington Court flats.

The incident happened between 2.30pm and 3pm on Monday, June 29.

The man is described as Asian, about 50, of a medium build, clean shaven and had short, red hair that was combed back.

The second article is from This is Nottingham:

- – - - – - – - -

Rapist ‘almost cut man’s face off’

A TEENAGER who raped a 15-year-old girl, head-butted his ex-girlfriend and slashed a man’s face will be locked up and eventually deported.

Alan Elyasi, 18, injured the man so seriously that it appeared “almost as if the front of his face was cut off”, Nottingham Crown Court heard.

Judge Sean Morris said Elyasi’s consecutive custodial sentences, adding up to ten years and four months, would have been longer were it not a waste of taxpayers’ money— he will be automatically sent back to Iraq on his release.

Judge Morris described him as a “predatory young male”.

Elyasi, of no fixed address, denied the rape, forcing his victim to give evidence.

The judge said it must have been traumatic for her to face in court a jury, judge and counsel.

“I have considered imprisonment for public protection in your case but I understand that deportation proceedings are to commence and you are to be sent back to Iraq at the conclusion of your sentence,” he said.

“I, therefore, do not see why the British taxpayer should be put to the extra expense of that kind of sentence when we will be rid of you upon your release.”

The girl Elyasi head-butted was his former girlfriend. Judge Morris described the act as “the mark of a coward”.

On the same day, Elyasi challenged her new boyfriend to a “contest”, which the other man declined, the court heard.

Elyasi produced a knife and repeatedly struck out at the man.

The most serious of several cuts was 15cm long and was so deep that part of the internal structure of the face was visible. The man also had cuts to his left hand, left thigh and upper chest.

The man slashed by Elyasi has been left with scars and movement in his face is affected.

“Attacking a man with a knife is again the mark of a coward,” Judge Morris said.

“He was unarmed. You haven’t the guts to take out your anger in any other way than a cowardly way.”

Elyasi, who pleaded not guilty to all the charges, denied even being present during the attack in Cope Street, Hyson Green.

He was, however, found guilty of section 18 wounding with intent.

The girl he raped had gone back to a Radford house with him, his male friend and her female friend, on March 27, 2008.

Elyasi followed her to the bathroom and raped her on the floor.

With no previous convictions and in custody since his arrest in September, Elyasi tried to swallow a razor blade after he was convicted. Because of that, the probation service is, the court heard, worried about how he will cope with a long period in custody.


Previous posts about Cultural Enrichment:

2009   Jun   27   Today’s Cultural Enrichment News
        27   Cultural Enrichment, Coming to a Country Near You
        28   Portuguese Cultural Enrichment
        28   More Danish Enrichment
        29   Cultural Enrichment in Paris
        29   Cultural Enrichment in Berlin
        29   Today in Denmark
        29   Cultural Enrichment in Scotland
        29   A Baby as a Weapon
        30   Cultural Enrichment in Italy
        30   Today’s Danish Dose
        30   Cultural Enrichment in Sweden
    Jul   1   Cultural Enrichment in Manchester
        1   Cultural Enrichment in Germany
        2   Cultural Enrichment in Brisbane
        2   Target: The French Police
        3   Sex-Slaves in Århus
        3   Cultural Enrichment from Bosnia
        4   Cultural Enrichment in Fredericiahttp://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2009/07/cultural-enrichment-in-leicester-and.html

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Student Loans Frozen- Foreign Aid- Illegal Wars- Squango’s All Come FIRST!

July 6, 2009 · 1 Comment

Student Loans Frozen — but Government Has Spent 200% of Student Grant on Wars and Foreign Aid

July 3, 2009 by BNP News  
Filed under National News

empty-universityCiting “financial austerity” measures, the Government has frozen all student loans while at the same time announcing that it has spent 200 percent of the total student grant budget on foreign aid and the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The freezing of the student grants was announced by university minister David Lammy, who received his own education courtesy of an Inner London Education Authority choral scholarship. He said that “difficult economic times” had necessitated the step. At the same time, tuition fees will increase by two percent to £3,290 per student, he added.

Mr Lammy’s announcement came on the same day that the House of Commons Defence Committee published figures which for the first time revealed official estimates on the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, both of which have seen extensive British involvement based on a pack of lies supported by both Tory and Labour parties.

According to the report, the annual cost of UK military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan this year alone reached £4.37 billion. The recently announced foreign aid budget for this year topped £6.6 billion – meaning that in the current financial year the Government has spent twice as much on wars and foreign aid than it has helping British kids go to university at home.

Those figures do not include what has been spent on foreign aid and the illegal wars in previous years. The total cost for the Iraq conflict has been £7 billion, while in Afghanistan the total cost of Britain’s involvement is estimated to be some £7.1 billion, boosted by a massive £3.5 billion pounds in the current fiscal year and £2.6 billion last year.

The total foreign aid budget, as detailed on the website of the Department of Foreign Aid and International Development (DFID), for the years 2006 to 2008 totalled £20.126 billion.

In addition to these outlays, the Government has also spent untold billions bailing out its bankster friends following their borderline criminal activities in the American subprime housing market. All of this has added up to generate a government budget deficit projected to top 12.4 percent of gross domestic product this year – a devastating exposé of the utter incompetence and mismanagement of the current ruling regime.

As usual, it is British people who are called upon to shoulder the burden caused by these disasters. Students are an easy target upon which the Government can focus for the first of its major cuts to try and balance its books. Figures from the universities indicate that an additional 60,000 school-leavers face being turned away from university in September due to the decline in funding from central government which has reduced the number of new places available.

The new cuts mark the second time in less than a year that students have been targeted for ’savings’ by the Government. Last October the then Universities Secretary John Denham admitted that he had failed to calculate the costings properly on the family income threshold for receiving a partial grant. As a result, the threshold had to be hurriedly reduced, causing tens of thousands of students to be faced with additional unplanned for debt.

* The British National Party demands an end to these extravagant, unnecessary and wasteful foreign handouts. Not a penny should be spent on anything outside of Britain until the needs and requirements of British people at home have been met.

http://bnp.org.uk/2009/07/does-the-church-of-england-hate-british-people/

PAKISTANIS TO DECIDE WHO CAN COME HERE– SEE MORE FABIAN LIES—-MORE!!

http://bnp.org.uk/2009/07/pakistani-nationals-recruited-as-immigration-decision-officials/

DID YOU KNOW WE SPENT MORE ON QUANGO’S THAN DEFENSE- NHS ETC?

GOV ADMIT TO ALMOST 800        TAX PAYERS ALLIENCE SAYS OVER 1000 NEARLY 2000…..GOV ADMIT TO £35 BILLION A YEAR—TPA SAYS DOUBLE IT!

TROOPS DIE DUE TO LACK OF PROPER EQUIPMENT–WHILE QUANGO’S GET BILLIONS—-TROOPS SENT ABROAD TO DIE AND KEPT WELL AWAY FROM THE UK………………….GENOCIDE!!

POPULATION 80 MILLION PLUS—-JUST WHO MAKES UP THE EXTRA NUMBERS–TAKE A GUESS!

BY THE WAY COMRADE BROWNSKI IS SENDING ONE BILLION TO HELP TRAIN THIRD WORLDERS……….OUR ONE BILLION!!

WHITE KIDS THROWN ON THE SCRAP HEAP—TOO WHITE -TOO BRITISH!

WAKE UP!!

→ 1 CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Drawing The Line…

July 6, 2009 · 1 Comment

'Vienna Viewed from the Belvedere Palace', by Canaletto, Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna

At the siege of Vienna in 1683 Islam seemed poised to overrun Christian Europe. We are in a new phase of a very old war.

 

 

Monday, July 06, 2009

Drawing the Line

by Baron Bodissey

 

A few days ago Robert Spencer wrote the following, in reference to the pretzels into which the Swift company has twisted itself to accommodate the demands of Muslim employees at its plant in Greeley, Colorado:

No one knows when this accommodation will stop, because no one has ever thought to ask or dared to ask Muslim groups in the U.S. just how much Sharia accommodation will satisfy them, and at what point they would be willing to begin to adapt to American society. And of course, if anyone ever did ask such a question and Muslim leaders answered in accord with the traditional canons of Islamic law, the answer would be that they will not stop demanding Sharia accommodation until the whole of Islamic law is implemented in the U.S., the Constitution overturned, and America is under Sharia government.

There is always more Sharia to accommodate, and now the precedent is being set all over the country that American businesses and institutions must change their practices in order to accommodate Sharia, but no one cares. Someone will draw the line somewhere, somehow, before it’s too late, won’t they? We’re all one big happy multicultural family, aren’t we? Aren’t we?

Someone will draw the line somewhere, somehow, before it’s too late, won’t they?

I’d like to address this question — not answer it, for there can be no answer — in an oblique way, by coming at it indirectly.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
King CanuteFor over a thousand years the normal form of European governance was the hereditary monarchy. Modern European democracy grew out of venerable monarchical structures, which were not destroyed (nor made vestigial) until after the devastation wrought by the Great War.

But where did hereditary monarchy come from? The institution did not spring full-grown from the head of Zeus. It was not the customary form of government throughout antiquity.

Hereditary monarchy — generally speaking, the primogeniture of a sovereign’s male offspring, usually accompanied by a divine seal of approval — arose during the Middle Ages, as the institution of kingship stabilized and was consolidated into the feudal system.

After the collapse of the Roman Empire, much of Europe was overrun by various Germanic tribes. Within these groups kingship was quite different from the imperial Roman model, and also from what arose several centuries later in northern Europe. It was not at all hereditary — although being the son of the king could give a man a leg up, in much the same way that a child of a Hollywood star is more likely to become a success in the movies than others in his age group.

The English word “king” derives from a Common Germanic root, kuniŋgaz, which developed into the regional variants cyning, kuning, and koning, and eventually into the words for “king” that are found in the Germanic languages today. It was made up of two particles, which were, in effect, kin and ing. “Kin” has the obvious meaning, “those related by blood”, and the suffix -ing means “one belonging to or having the characteristics of”. These parts were combined into “kin-ing”, so that the king was an exemplar of his tribe, someone who best represented his own kind.

The office of kingship existed at more or less the tribal level. The king attained to this position through a combination of valued characteristics: prowess in battle, physical strength and courage, organizational skills, and all the other traits which might cause a man to be respected by his fellows. Gaining the office did not always require personal combat, but no king could retain his position without the skills of a warrior. The greatest kings — and the founders of what would later become dynasties — were those who were acclaimed in battle and also shrewd in political matters, who combined skill with intelligence, who mixed muscle with brains.

Based on his prowess and skills, the king was chosen by acclamation within the local group or tribe. During the early Middle Ages the landscape of northern Europe was a patchwork of local kings who, using today’s nomenclature, might be more accurately identified as tribal chieftains or warlords.

These were uncouth barbarians by the standards that arose five or six centuries later. They were violent, brutal, and unscrupulous towards anyone outside of their domain. Towards their own tribe — their kin — they were loyal and protective. The king dispensed justice within the group, and if he were not lawful and fair by the group’s standards, he would not remain king for long, for there were always competitors eager to supplant him.

Do these early kings — rude barbarians who took care of their own — remind you of anything?

Hint: it’s something that we’ve been discussing here recently.
- – - - – - – - -
I don’t know about you, but the cyning and his tribal brothers put me in mind of the Danish chapter of Hells Angels.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
During the Middle Ages, as what eventually became European civilization was emerging, local kings warred with one another over resources and territory. Kingdoms met and coalesced, either by conquest or mutual agreement. As a kingdom incorporated its neighbors, the territory governed by a king became larger, and what used to be neighboring kingdoms became duchies, counties, earldoms, and other smaller political units within a larger kingdom. These components could be traded or captured through warfare, so that the map of Europe resembled a crazy quilt of shifting political allegiances.

The feudal system was the glue that held the new system together. When a duke or count became subordinate to a king, he entered into a tributary relationship. The vassal owed tribute — in the form of monetary wealth or service — to his suzerain. Only within the feudal system could an entity as large as Normandy levy war against a comparable political grouping across the English Channel.

From a local lord’s point of view, inter-state warfare was bad enough, but lawlessness and brigandage within a kingdom were even worse. Lawlessness called into question the effectiveness and legitimacy of the sovereign, so that it was in the interest of the king to claim a monopoly on violence within his realm, in order to secure the political stability of his reign.

Thus was born the King’s Peace, the precursor of modern civil society and the rule of law. By denying the right to commit violence to anyone other than agents of the crown, the king guaranteed a peace in which the commonweal could flourish. Provided that he acted justly and without evident corruption, a king who kept the peace retained legitimacy in the eyes of his subjects.

The heritability of the royal office was part of the process of political stabilization. A kingdom in which rival contenders strove for the crown upon the death of the monarch was likely to be weaker and more fissiparous than its rivals. The institution of hereditary monarchy was a natural Darwinian response — the kingdoms that adopted it were more likely to survive, expand, and incorporate their rivals than those which did not.

Add aristocratic inbreeding to the mix, and by the time we arrive at the 18th and 19th centuries, the brawling barbarian strongmen of the Germanic dawn had given way to the effete noblemen with their inherited wealth and privileges.

Say goodbye to Gorm den Gamle. Say hello to the Habsburg lip.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

Faustus:   Stay, Mephistophilis, and tell me, what good
    will my soul do thy lord?
Mephistophilis:   Enlarge his kingdom.

                  — Christopher Marlowe, from Dr. Faustus, Scene V

The Emperor’s New ClothesA decline in the quality of kingship did not necessarily inhibit the general welfare, provided that the monarch could maintain the rule of law that allowed civil society to flourish. If justice was seen to be done, it didn’t matter that the warrior kings had devolved into wastrels, madmen, and pallid fops.

As the Middle Ages gave way to the Renaissance, the task of enforcement and tax collection was removed from the king’s men-at-arms and handed over to the servants of an expanding bureaucratic state. When the Industrial Revolution kicked in, the growth of the state became exponential.

By the time the 20th century arrived, the massive bureaucratic state had developed a life and logic of its own, and was only marginally affected by the personality of the monarch — or indeed by the decisions of parliamentary bodies. Kings, queens, governments, ministers, factions, and parties rose and fell, but the state behemoth continued its expansion regardless.

It’s important to remember that no cataclysmic events — not even the Bolshevik Revolution — interrupted the functioning of state bureaucracies. The Czar’s bureaus became Lenin’s bureaus, and the agents of the Okhrana continued their work for the NKVD.

The inexorable logic of the mass bureaucratic state is what has led us to precipice on which we teeter today.

The internal dynamics of a bureaucratic organism require it to grow, and grow, and grow. To grow it must expand its control over its subjects. Hence the welfare state, which sends the tendrils of the bureaucratic regime into every nook and cranny where ordinary people live out their lives. Hence the proliferation of laws, rules, and regulations.

Technological advances increase productivity, and as soon as it appears the additional wealth is vacuumed up by the ravenous maw of the modern bureaucratic state. Our productive surplus has been used to build the infrastructure and hire the employees assigned to control the people who produce the wealth — the “free-range serfs” of modern post-industrial society.

The state is everywhere, doing everything: keeping you safe, telling you what to eat and drink, setting limits on what you may say, and to whom. The state minds your kids, arranges your transportation, pays for your health care, puts you in a nursing home, and finally euthanizes you when your usefulness is at an end.

Above all the state gets your mind right.

One of modern bureaucracy’s primary functions is to get your mind right, so that your actions serve the purposes of the state without the necessity of armed guards and constant surveillance. With a near-unanimity of ideology within the apparatus of government, the media, the academy, and public education, coercion is all but unnecessary. The gulag is in the mind of the citizen.

This historical process has unfolded inexorably to reach the endgame we are now facing. From the Enlightenment through Marxism and the Progressive Movement to post-industrial Social Democracy, the trend has been towards an ever-expanding bureaucracy, which of necessity requires more and more socialism, regardless of what name the reigning ideology bears.

As the 20th century progressed, the bureaucratic leviathan chafed at its final limitation: the nation-state. Only by dissolving borders and distinct national identities could the power of the bureaucrats continue to increase. Once again an inexorable logic drove the progression of ideological events as the century unfolded: universal suffrage, universal human rights, the elevation of “discrimination” to the rank of deadly sin, inclusion, diversity, multiculturalism, the EU, the NAU, and the UN.

To fulfill the global plan, our nations must be destroyed by incorporating people from alien cultures so as to dilute our separate national identities and remove the last barrier to the worldwide hegemony of the socialist superstate. Ideological indoctrination through the schools and the media has entrenched the idea that resisting the incorporation of foreigners is racist, xenophobic, and deeply sinful. The result is that it’s difficult now for most people to whole-heartedly support nationalistic ideals. No one can contemplate the defense of his own culture without a sense of moral uneasiness.

The international Islamic jihad has slipped a blade into that hairline crack of self-doubt and widened it into a gaping fissure. The cracks are now spreading, and threaten to bring the entire edifice of Western Civilization crashing down around us.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
Unfortunately for the mandarins of the international socialist bureaucracy, the strategic rot that they introduced into the system infects all participants at every level, so that the elite managers and the hoi-polloi alike have acquired the same allergy to national and cultural self-defense.

As long as the multicultural regime had no one to deal with but its own Western clients, this problem had no serious consequences. Where the internalization of PC ideology is insufficient, shaming, ostracism, and the threatened loss of employment or government benefits are generally enough to keep the sheep in the fold.

However, the system has now incorporated the elements of its downfall. The imported foreigners come pre-indoctrinated with an alien ideology — Islam — which is resistant to the suicidal tenets of modern political correctness. Not only that, the same ideology sanctions ruthlessness, brutality, theft, murder, rape, mendaciousness, and any other form of vile behavior that will protect Islam and inject it successfully into its new host culture.

The erstwhile guardians of our society are helpless in the face of the invaders. The only techniques that are available to them — tolerance, understanding, education, persuasion, dialogue, compromise, social pressure, and brief prison sentences — are ineffective against the parasites they so thoughtlessly imported. The newcomers are not only resistant, but even turn the principles of their host culture against itself. The guardians of the great Western enterprise can only stand by and wring their hands while the alien culture employs all the forbidden violent techniques to subdue and subvert the decayed socialist experiment that they now inhabit.

None of the former bulwarks of the West — the military, the police, the legal system, the churches, the schools, the government — are effective against the vigorous and deadly hostility of the newcomers. The native populace lies open to the depredations of its Muslim guests. The scimitar is at our throats, and our only recourse is to submit, to hand over all our wealth and women, and then await the instructions of the new emirs.

If there is to be a resistance, it must come from atavistic elements within the native population, from those in whom, for whatever reason, the precepts of the new metrosexual multicultural indoctrination have failed to take hold. If there is hope, it lies in the proles: the rednecks, the peasants, the crackers, the boors, the rubes, and the churls.

The old ways never died; they just retreated far from the salons and soirées of polite society. Hengist and Horsa did not vanish, but they seldom appear in the drawing-rooms of the bien pensants. If anybody is to defend and reclaim the heart of our culture from the inroads of the Mohammedans, they will be the ones.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
And so we return to Jønke and the Danish chapter of Hells Angels.

If our police and military academies are more interested in graduating a diverse group of cadets than in preparing young men to fight and defend us, then to whom are we to turn? What group of rough men will stand ready to do violence on our behalf?

Make no mistake about it: such rough men will arise to resist the incursions of a violent alien culture. There may not be enough of them to win the confrontation, but even so they will rise up to engage the enemy. Violent resistance in some form will emerge. It is inevitable.

As of this writing, there is no sign that the traditional protectors of the citizenry are prepared to undertake this task. The police and the military do their heroic best, but they are hobbled by the insane rules of PC and operate under the thumb of superiors who are themselves in thrall to multicultural ideology.

Militias, motorcycle gangs, organized criminals, and other marginal groups are bound by no such civilized niceties. They are ready to ride out and do battle when their interests and their own kin are threatened.

So imagine that you are a working-class father who just barely gets by. You go to work, support your family, and do your best to live right. Thirty years ago your neighborhood was a modest but lawful inner suburb inhabited by people like yourself and your family.

But cultural enrichment has changed all that, and your twelve-year-old daughter has just been gang-raped by a group of immigrant thugs. The police promise to do their best, but their best isn’t much. Statistically speaking, there’s less than a 10% chance that the perpetrators of this abomination against you and your family will ever be caught, prosecuted, convicted, and punished. And then — even if the wheels of justice somehow turn in your favor — after a year or two the young punks will in all likelihood be free to roam the streets and repeat their monstrous crimes.

Now imagine that a local chapter of Hells Angels opens up just down the street. You notice that the muggings and assaults in your neighborhood decrease dramatically. You find yourself feeling reassured when one of those Harleys roars by your front stoop.

And, more than anything else, you notice what happens to the gangs of marauding punks who target little white girls. After the most recent incidents, the perpetrators — who are well-known locally for committing these crimes, even though the police can never gather enough evidence to convict them — run into a little “rocker” trouble. They turn up in back alleys with serious disabling injuries, and are sometimes found dead in dumpsters with bullets in their heads.

And you know what? You don’t really mind.

You know that what is being done is against the law, and that it ought to disturb you. It violates what used to be your sense of right and wrong. But you also know at a gut level that your neighborhood — neglected for decades by the politicians and the legal system — is now safer than it was before, and that you and your children can finally let go of some of the fear that you have been living with for so long.

And all because a violent motorcycle gang finally took action on behalf of you and your neighbors. They, unlike the central authorities, are taking care of their own — which includes you. No wonder you feel the urge to slip them a bill every now and then to help keep their hogs up and running.

The media refer to all of this as a “gang war”, as an “escalation by both sides”, but you know better. You know that what’s really happening is that the only people who are willing to stand up and fight are mounting a local defense against a deadly invasion. You know that the media and the politicians are lying to you, and all your neighbors know it, too. This subversive knowledge is spreading rapidly by word of mouth throughout your entire district.

The process described above is how earth-shaking changes occur and take the Powers That Be by surprise.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
“But Baron,” you say, “do you mean to tell me that you advocate that Hells Angels become the leaders of a new political order?”

No, I don’t mean that at all.

My analyses — as I am forced to repeat ad nauseam — are descriptive, not normative. I describe what seems obvious and likely, speculate on what is less obvious and more unlikely, and try to determine what our choices are.

Suppose we face a stark choice. Suppose our only choice is between swearing fealty to the leader of Hells Angels, or submitting to the hosts of Mohammed.

The Hells Angels are not the kind of people you want to invite into your parlor to drink tea. They are, after all, criminals who are prepared to use violence to defend their turf.

But so are the Muslims. And life under their vile rule would be far worse than anything that Jønke would ever think of doing to you. To pick an example at random, the Hells Angels would never treat women like cattle. Nor would they have the inbred propensity to sodomize their little brothers.

The other day I asked Dymphna: “If your only choice was between the local chapter of Hells Angels and the Muslims, what would you choose?”

She replied, “Hells Angels, no problem.”

It’s quite likely that these will be our only choices. I keep betting there’s a third way, but I’m betting against very steep odds.

In order for another way to be found, it will have to form through the legal channels of our existing society. That means it will have to be done by voting, and that we will have to organize and propagandize against the media riptide that wants to carry everyone out to sea in the opposite direction.

It means that change can only be effected at the margins: a city council here, a parliamentary seat there, a newspaper editor brought around to our point of view.

I don’t think there’s enough time for such strategies to work, but I have to try. I choose to believe that we can save some version of what we have now, but it’s more likely that we are going to have to throw in our lot with the bikers, the militias, the paranoids, and all the other people who fall outside the mainstream — because they will be our only hope.

But I want to try anyway. When we lose civil society, we will be a long time regaining it. During the interim we will have to give up much that we hold dear.

So I’m committed to the effort to find a Third Way.

However, it looks like we are entering a twilight period of chaos, and after a while a new order will coalesce around the strong and the shrewd. Men who are committed to ruthlessness and lethality will then turn up to lead the remnants of the old order against the forces that would destroy it completely. A man of that sort will become the kuniŋgaz, the cyning, the rough champion who can protect himself and his own against the incursions of those who would destroy him.

Later, much later, will come the equivalent of King Alfred, to unite the warlords and restart the engine of civilization.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
So now we return to Robert Spencer’s original question: Someone will draw the line somewhere, somehow, before it’s too late, won’t they?

Unfortunately, the field on which the line would be drawn is rapidly submerging and being eroded. Soon there will no longer be a place on which the line may be drawn, or distinct entities to draw it between.

Holger DanskeRight now we are still civilized. We still rightfully recoil in horror from the idea of barbarians and criminals. We still cherish the lawful and refined civilization that we have painfully constructed over so many centuries.

But it may not be ours to keep. Western Civilization carries within it the seeds of its own destruction, and unless enough well-educated and thoughtful people awaken to understand that fact, it may be bound for the dumpster of history, where so many have preceded it.

The existing order depends on what is generally known as the social contract, which gives the state a monopoly on violence in return for its protecting its citizens. But that contract has been broken. Justice is no longer seen to be done.

There is a lag time in the reaction of the populace to this state of affairs, and it has yet to run its course. People are slow to rouse. Nevertheless, the reaction is inevitably coming.

It’s time to examine the real alternatives as they are likely to confront us. Not as we wish they were, not as we hope they might be, but as what is predictable and probable, given the times we live in.

The real question may be this one: When it comes down to a choice between two forms of barbarism, which will you choose: theirs or ours?

 

→ 1 CommentCategories: Uncategorized

UK Column News Headlines..

July 6, 2009 · 4 Comments

→ 4 CommentsCategories: Uncategorized

Neda- She Was A Christian…

July 6, 2009 · Leave a Comment

She was a Christian!by sheikyermami on July 5, 2009

6a00d8341c60bf53ef011571c22b87970b-500wi

In the oft-reproduced picture run across world media, her cross is cropped out. What deceit.

In the media’s ongoing campaign to institute the agenda of the Organization of the Islamic Conference and advance Islam, it has been previously withheld from the public that Neda Soltani was a Christian.

Atlas Shrugs: 

NEDA SOLTANI, THE SYMBOL OF IRANIAN RESISTANCE, WAS A CHRISTIAN

That Neda was a Christian is ample proof that everyone in Iran who took to the streets was marching for liberty and one man one vote. How vile to imply that millions marched for the inside politicking of Islamic cleric rule. Her religion flies in the face of every cold blooded pundit who has attempted to dismiss this historic movement as simply more sharia in shades of green. Photo hat tip Robert 

6a00d8341c60bf53ef01157134aa62970b-500wiIRANIAN REVOLUTION DAY 23

Snapshots: Women of the revolution

THE WOMEN OF THE IRANIAN REVOLUTION 

http://sheikyermami.com/2009/07/05/she-was-a-christian/

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

UNHRC [Fabian] Helps To Show ” The true face of islam” By Supporting and Promoting islam!!

July 6, 2009 · Leave a Comment

UNHRC helps to show “the true face of Islam” by supporting and promoting Islamby sheikyermami on July 5, 2009

Fasten your seatbelts! Here comes:  Islam’s contribution to ‘refugee  law’! 

bigfuck-the-un8

The  United Nations has been promoting the interests of Islam for some  time.

It  highlights the passing of a resolution on the defamation of religion  (really the defamation of Islam) by the UN Human Rights  Council earlier this year, and the recent launch of a book by the UN High Commissioner  for Refugees in Saudi Arabia  … the  book commends Islam for the wonderful contribution  it has made to the treatment of refugees.

Of course there was no mention in the  article posted on the UNHCR article about the persecuted people  fleeing from Islamic nations such as Iraq and  Afghanistan…

E-News, Salt Shakers, July 1,  2009

The United Nations is increasingly  supporting and promoting Islam. This is partly due to the  influence of the Islamic  nations that are part of the UN – they work together as  the Organisation of the Islamic  Conference <http://www.oic-oci.org/home.asp> (OIC), which  has 57 ‘member states’. The OIC notes  ”Every year the United Nations General  Assembly adopts a resolution on ‘Cooperation between the United  Nations and the Organization of the Islamic Conference’.”  (It appears the OIC is the giant black hole in the corrupt United Nations…)

Defamation of ‘Religion’

In  March 2009 the United Nations Human Rights  Council (UNHRC) voted to  condemn the ‘defamation of religion’.
In effect this really  meant condemning the criticism of Islam. Western nations  refused to support the resolution because it focused on condemning  criticism of Islam. [Media report :  U.N. rights body condemns "defamation" of religion)

Ironically the motion was supported by UNHRC members  China, Cuba, Russia and all the  nations belonging to the Organisation of the Islamic Conference  (OIC).

  • When China and Cuba are looking after  ‘human rights’ we have a problem!

 

Islam and refugees
Now, the  United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees  (UNHCR) has launched a book that claims Islam has had a profoundly  positive influence on the way the world treats  refugees!

The book, called  'The Right to Asylum between  Islamic Shari'ah and International Refugee Law: A Comparative  Study', was sponsored by the UNHCR and launched  in Saudi  Arabia last  week.

The ceremony was  addressed by the High  Commissioner for Refugees,  António Guterres.

The report  acknowledges that the UNHCR has been working with the Organisation  of the Islamic Conference on refugee matters, so it isn’t really  surprising to see this glowing report of Islam coming from the  UNHCR.

Here are just a few of  the extracts form the UNHCR’s own article about the launch of the  book and the Commissioner’s address.

Many of the article’s  comments about Islam ignore the historical truth of Islam’s  domination of other nations.
The statement that Islam  ‘forbids forcing refugees to change their beliefs  [to Islam]’ seems to  suggest the idea that Islam promotes a tolerance of other  religions – however, it ignores the fact that some Muslim  countries  ban other religions from openly practicing their  religion. In Saudi Arabia it is  illegal for Christians to meet openly or to own a  Bible!

No  mention is made of Islam’s poor treatment of apostates  (Muslims who leave Islam) or  women.
 
The fact that Muslims are fleeing  their own countries – seeking asylum/refuge in other nations –  seems to contradict the claim of this book that Islam is the model  for the treatment of refugees!

The UNHCR  article about the book includes these extracts (link to full article  below):

  • “The book says  Islam’s 1,400-year-old  tradition of generosity toward people fleeing persecution has  had more influence on modern-day international refugee  law than any other historical  source.”  
  • the High  Commissioner said “all  the principles embodied in modern international refugee law are  to be found in the Shari’ah. Protection of  refugees, their property and families, non-refoulement [forced  return], the civilian character of asylum, voluntary  repatriation – all are referred to in  the Holy Koran.”  
  • In his study,  Professor Abu Al-Wafa describes how Islam and Arab tradition respect  refugees, including non-Muslims; forbids forcing them to change  their beliefs; avoids compromising their rights; seeks to  reunite families; and guarantees the protection of their lives  and property.  
  • The book also  reflects UNHCR’s close  association with the member states of the Organization of the  Islamic Conference (OIC), which itself adopted  in 1990 a Declaration on Human Rights in Islam stipulating that  every human being fleeing persecution has the right to seek  asylum and receive protection in another country.  
  • OIC  Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu notes that the book  ”demonstrates the  equitable and tolerant rules Islamic Shari’ah applies to  refugees and how it is keenly concerned with  their welfare and interests, while confirming human integrity  and man’s right to a free, decent life.”

UNHCR chief launches book on Islam’s contributions to refugee law

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia, June 24 (UNHCR)  A UNHCR-sponsored book on the influence of Islam and Arab tradition on modern-day international refugee law was released this week in Saudi Arabia, at a ceremony addressed by High Commissioner for Refugees António Guterres.

The comparative study, commissioned by Guterres and contained in a new book by Cairo University law professor and dean of the law faculty, Ahmed Abu Al-Wafa, was launched at Naif Arab University in Riyadh. Presiding over the ceremony were Prince Naif bin Abdul Aziz, Second Deputy Premier, Minister of Interior and head of Naif Arab University’s Supreme Council and the university’s president , Professor Abdul-Aziz bin Saqr al-Ghamedi.

The book says Islam’s 1,400-year-old tradition of generosity toward people fleeing persecution has had more influence on modern-day international refugee law than any other historical source.

In remarks as part of Naif Arab University’s commencement exercise, the High Commissioner said “all the principles embodied in modern international refugee law are to be found in the Shari’ah. Protection of refugees, their property and families, non-refoulement [forced return], the civilian character of asylum, voluntary repatriation  all are referred to in the Holy Koran.”

In his foreword to “The Right to Asylum between Islamic Shari’ah and International Refugee Law: A Comparative Study,” Guterres says the new book shows that more than any other historical source, Islamic law and tradition underpin the modern legal framework upon which UNHCR bases its global activities on behalf of tens of millions of uprooted people. This includes the right of everyone to seek and enjoy asylum from persecution as well as prohibitions against sending those in need of protection back into danger.

“Even though many of those values were a part of Arab tradition and culture even before Islam, this fact is not always acknowledged today, even in the Arab world,” Guterres writes. “The international community should value this 14-century-old tradition of generosity and hospitality and recognize its contributions to modern law.”

In his study, Professor Abu Al-Wafa describes how Islam and Arab tradition respect refugees, including non-Muslims; forbids forcing them to change their beliefs; avoids compromising their rights; seeks to reunite families; and guarantees the protection of their lives and property.

“Today, the majority of refugees worldwide are Muslims,” Guterres writes. “This fact occurs at a time when the level of extremism  ethnic and religious  is on the rise around the globe, even in the world’s most developed societies. Racism, xenophobia and populist fear-mongering manipulate public opinion and confuse refugees with illegal migrants and even terrorists.

We believe this book can make an important contribution in fighting prejudice and distortions about
Islam.

– High Commissioner António Gutteres

“These attitudes have also contributed to misperceptions about Islam, and Muslim refugees have paid a heavy price. Let us be clear: refugees are not terrorists. They are first and foremost the victims of terrorism. This book reminds us of our duty to counter such attitudes.”

The book also reflects UNHCR’s close association with the member states of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), which itself adopted in 1990 a Declaration on Human Rights in Islam stipulating that every human being fleeing persecution has the right to seek asylum and receive protection in another country.

In his foreword to the book, OIC Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu notes that the book “demonstrates the equitable and tolerant rules Islamic Shari’ah applies to refugees and how it is keenly concerned with their welfare and interests, while confirming human integrity and man’s right to a free, decent life.”

Naif Arab University’s Prof. al-Ghamedi, said the theme of the study “gains importance in the light of the increase in recent years in the numbers of refugees in Arab and Islamic countries.”

Professor Ahmad At-Tayyib, rector of al-Azhar University in Cairo, noted that the Arab concept of asylum, or “ijarah,” pre-dated Islam and was endorsed by Islamic Shari’ah “because it was one of the established good practices in their traditions and customs, involving noble manners and ethical values such as rescue of people in distress and protection of the oppressed.”

Guterres also presented the book to Prince Faisal Bin Abdullah, president of the Saudi Red Crescent Authority.

“We believe this book can make an important contribution in fighting prejudice and distortions about Islam,” the High Commissioner told the prince. “It can help to show the true face of Islam.”

 

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

CHINA- No Political Correctness Here…Muslims Riot- Muslims Dead!

July 6, 2009 · Leave a Comment

China: No Political Correctness Here…by sheikyermami on July 5, 2009

*  Newsflash: Catch & Release is really a baaaad idea:

Ex-Gitmo headbanger leads Taliban campaign against US troops in Afghanistan

Protest by Chinese Muslims turns violent

July 05, 2009

GILLIAN WONG/ASSOCIATED PRESS

BEIJING–A protest in China’s restive Muslim far west turned violent today, state media reported, and activists said police fired shots in the air and used batons to disperse a crowd that had swelled to nearly 1,000.

in-this-image-provided-by-001

The late afternoon protest in the city of Urumqi was a rare mass demonstration in Xinjiang province, a region that has seen occasional separatist violence against Chinese rule.

More than 300 people, mostly members of the largely Muslim Uighur ethnic group, had gathered to demand an investigation into a brawl June 25 between Uighur and Han Chinese workers at a toy factory in southern China, said Gulinisa Maimaiti, a 32-year-old employee of a foreign company who took part in the protest.

 

Two reportedly died in last month’s factory melee in southern Guangdong province, but Gulisina said protesters believed the real figure was higher.

At first, the 300 people held a silent, sit-down protest at the People’s Square in Urumqi, Gulinisa said. “We are mourning our compatriots who were beaten to death in Guangdong,” Gulinisa said in a phone interview.

Accounts of what happened differed, but the violence seemed to have started when the crowd, which Gulinisa said grew to 1,000 people, refused to disperse.

The government’s Xinhua News Agency said the crowd attacked passers-by, torched vehicles and interrupted traffic on some roads. Xinhua said police were at the scene trying to maintain order, but the report did not provide details.

Gulinisa said police pinned protesters to the ground before taking some 40 protesters away.

“The police fired shots into the sky. They took people away in cars,” he said.

Dilxat Raxit, a spokesman for the pro-independence World Uighur Congress based in Germany, said he received calls from Urumqi describing the protest as peaceful until police used force to try to clear the square.

“Riot police were using police batons to beat people,” he said. One caller he spoke with said police opened fire.

Dilxat said some protesters were beaten badly. One of his informants told him that one person was killed. The account could not immediately be corroborated.

Video shot from a building nearby and photos from mobile phones taken from the protest showed people running from police and a car on fire. In other shots, smoke rises in the distance and fire engines race to the protest.

The Urumqi police and city government refused or declined comment about the incident.

Tensions between Uighurs and Chinese are never far from the surface in Xinjiang, China’s vast Central Asian buffer province.

Uighur separatists have waged a sporadic campaign for independence in recent decades, and the military, armed police and riot squads maintain a visible presence in the region. After a few years of relative calm, separatist violence picked up last year with attacks against border police and bombings of government buildings.

Muslim Uighurs riot as ethnic tensions rise in western China

Protests over deaths of workers turn violent as mobs burn buses and attack residents from minorities in western province… Guardian UK sheikyermami

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

What Happened To The Buddhist’s Of Indonesia?

July 6, 2009 · Leave a Comment

What happened to the Buddhists of Indonesia?by sheikyermami on July 5, 2009

Any idea? Fill in here……………………………
borodobur_javaBorobudur

(Some of) today’s exploits from the Religion of Peace:

Moderate, modern Turkey threatens Aramaeic Cultural Heritage 

    15

The world’s oldest Christian monastery is being threatened by the Religion of Peace in Turkey, which has already taken the Hagia Sophia and other property – in addition to the genocide.

UK Mosque Leader Pushes 7/7 Government Conspiracy Theory…

UK: Muslim Councillors Making More than $1000 per Minute of Work…

Ethiopian Muslims Gun Down Two Christians Building a Church

Kidnapped Doctor Speaks Out on Forced Marriage Attempt…

Biden: U.S. Won’t Stand in Israel’s Way on Iran

Iran Continues Crackdown Including Executing Captured Protesters

Arabs burn  Talmud and of the Five Books of Moses in Yeshiva, Jews set world on fire: (Well, not quite)

Communications Minister Moshe Kahlon commented, “Whoever has not yet understood with whom we are dealing should look at the pictures of the burnt holy books. If Jews had burned dozens of Muslim books, the whole world would be shaking.” More>>

Philippines: Muslims slaughter Christians at Sunday service

No worries. They were probably creationists. And maybe even right-wing extremists. Right? Right??  Funny how Muslims never forget to mention Baruch Goldstein for playing a bit of jihad on them…

“Philippines church bomb blast kills five,” by Anne Barrowclough for the Times Online, July 5 (thanks to JW):

6a0111685b4b71970c011571bfa2d7970b-800wi

Islamist militants have been blamed for a bomb blast in the Philippines today which killed at least five people and wounded dozens more.The bomb exploded outside the Immaculate Conception cathedral in Cotabato city, 545 miles (880 kilometers) south of Manila, as church-goers celebrated Mass.

 

A woman selling roast pork was killed on the spot while four others, including a soldier and three-year-old boy, died in a nearby hospital. Among the wounded were five soldiers who were passing the cathedral in an army van when the device, fashioned from a mortar round, exploded said army spokesman Colonel Jonathan Ponce.

“This is the handiwork of the rogue members of the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF),” Colonel Ponce told reporters, referring to the Muslim organisation which has waged a decades long battle for self rule in the southern island of Mindanao.

The improvised explosive was hidden near a row of food stalls selling roasted pig, said regional military commander Major General Cayton.

Witnesses said the bishop celebrating mass had just finished reading the gospel and was about to begin his homily when an explosion was heard.

“The explosion was so loud as if the cathedral was about to collapse,” Merly Sandoval, a churchgoer, told a local radio station.

“It was like loud and frightening thunder. People inside the packed cathedral ran towards the altar. Outside, everybody was screaming, there was so much blood on the ground.”…

 

Skeikyermami

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

174th British Soldier Killed Sunday- 5 in 5 Days! The Illegal Fabian War!!

July 6, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Reapatriated in His Coffin Again!

Reapatriated in His Coffin Again!

THE M.O.D COMPANY HAVE INFORMED HIS FAMILY!

R.I.P. SOLDIER….

STILL NOT ENOUGH?

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Uncategorized

Nazi Of The Week…

July 6, 2009 · 1 Comment

Wednesday, July 01, 2009

Nazi of the Week

by Baron Bodissey

 

The curse of neo-Nazi ideology has spread to virtually every nook and cranny of modern culture.

One of our longest-serving and most revered constitutional monarchs has succumbed to the blandishments of fascism’s supporters, and has disgraced an august institution with the poisonous doctrines peddled by Hitler’s heirs.

As visual proof of this fascistic transformation, consider the following photo of the notorious and repugnant Odin’s Cross, which has now been turned into a putatively honorable award.

You won’t believe your eyes:
- – - - – - – - -
QE 2 Cross
That’s right: read it and weep. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has embraced this foul symbol and gone over to the Dark Side of the Cross, as so many have before her. Her subjects now have every reason to rise up and repudiate her!

Here’s an excerpt from the account published in The Daily Mail:

Families of 8,000 British troops killed since WWII to be given new Elizabeth Cross medal

The Queen has agreed to honour the families of Britain’s war dead with a new award in her name.

Those who have lost loved ones on the frontline or in terrorist attacks will be presented with the new Elizabeth Cross.

It is the first military honour granted by a monarch since the Queen’s father King George VI created the George Cross for civilian heroism in 1940.

Next of kin of the 8,000 servicemen who have perished in the line of duty since the end of the Second World War will receive the sterling silver cross.

GAIA..

Gates of Vienna

→ 1 CommentCategories: Uncategorized